(Closed) I bought two pairs of glittery wedding shoes, which is better?

posted 8 years ago in Shoes
  • poll: what would you do?
    Keep the Badgley Mischkas, you only get married once! : (84 votes)
    52 %
    Go for the Rampage sparklies, they're just as beautiful! : (78 votes)
    48 %
  • Post # 3
    Member
    5921 posts
    Bee Keeper
    • Wedding: December 2010

    Before I picked, I chose based on appearance before looking at the brand. You can tell the Bridesmaid or Best Man ones are higher quality, but the Rampage ones were the ones I chose, LOL.  I don’t think the Bridesmaid or Best Man ones are THAT much worth the extra cost.

    Post # 4
    Member
    3709 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: May 2011

    Go for the rampage and get some Dr Scholl’s for her gel inserts =) You can use that $160 for something else.

    Post # 5
    Member
    1920 posts
    Buzzing bee
    • Wedding: March 2012

    They’re both really nice. And considering not many people see your shoes under your dress I would go for the cheaper ones.

    Post # 6
    Member
    1145 posts
    Bumble bee
    • Wedding: September 2011

    I think it depends how long you want to wear them.  The Bridesmaid or Best Man will surely be more comfortable for longer than the Rampage, but if you think that you’ll only want to wear them for a certain amount of time, then stick with the cheaper ones.  They are both adorable, and can totally be worn again too.  So if you want to wear them all night, and wear them again, I’d go for Bridesmaid or Best Man.

    Post # 7
    Member
    538 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: September 2011 - Franciscan Gardens

    @Linz1231: I did that too~ I think the Rampage ones are prettier! I like the leather heel!

    Post # 8
    Member
    3126 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: December 2017

    I like the Rampage shoes.

    Post # 9
    Member
    5921 posts
    Bee Keeper
    • Wedding: December 2010

    Ehh, I wore $150 Kate Spades and they hurt my feet so bad.  I wore a pair of $20 pumps to the rehearsal that were so comfy, so price doesn’t make a difference all the time.

    Post # 10
    Member
    3624 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: October 2011

    I don’t know those shoe brands, so they meant nothing to me, I also couldn’t tell which one was more expensive, and based on first appearance looks, I chose the rampage! I think they’re prettier. Although, they are both awesome pairs of shoes.

    Post # 11
    Member
    6015 posts
    Bee Keeper
    • Wedding: March 2012

    I think the rampage ones are prettier!

    Post # 12
    Member
    407 posts
    Helper bee
    • Wedding: January 2011

    On looks alone, not knowing the brands… I chose the Rampage ones on the left! Pretty 🙂

    Post # 13
    Member
    759 posts
    Busy bee

    There’s something about the Rampage shoes that I like more than the BMs.  Can’t put my finger on it exactly, but I think I like the placing of the bling/crystals on the shoe better.   

    ETA:  If the BMs are more comfortable and you think the Rampages will make your dogs howl before the night’s over then most def get the BMs!  🙂

     

    Post # 14
    Member
    94 posts
    Worker bee
    • Wedding: October 2012

    I picked the Bridesmaid or Best Man because it look likes the Rampage have loose glitter on them and those have a tendency to “shed” and leave a trail behind you.

    Post # 15
    Member
    6394 posts
    Bee Keeper
    • Wedding: September 2011

    I liked the look of the Rampage ones better, too! 🙂

    Post # 16
    Member
    2476 posts
    Buzzing bee
    • Wedding: June 2010

    I personally like the Badgley Mischkas better because they look nicer and have the sparkles on the heel too.  If you wear them over and over again after your wedding, then they’ll be more worth it in the long run (they’ll probably last longer than the Rampage ones). 

    The topic ‘I bought two pairs of glittery wedding shoes, which is better?’ is closed to new replies.

    Find Amazing Vendors