(Closed) Is 0.5 too small for an emerald cut halo?

posted 3 years ago in Rings
Post # 2
Member
436 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: June 2017 - Country Cottage and Gardens

Not sure if anyone will post personal pictures but I found this thread on Pricescope where there’s a bunch of pictures of one: http://www.pricescope.com/forum/show-me-the-ring/engaged-0-5ct-emerald-cut-with-halo-t109198.html

I personally think it looks great but it comes down to personal preferene. Some people prefer a larger center stone in relation to the halo diamonds and some would rather have a larger overall appearance (smaller stone with a large halo). 

There’s also this cool site that another Bee posted recently: http://www.diamdb.com/compare/0.5ct-emerald-vs-0.75ct-emerald/

It doesn’t allow you to customize settings so you can’t see the halo directly but it makes it a little easier to imagine. I just did 0.5 and 0.75 carats because I didn’t see where you could do a single diamond. But you could compare whatever sizes you want. 

Post # 3
Member
2853 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: May 2014

Honestly, I think a .5 is a good size for a halo. 

Post # 4
Member
660 posts
Busy bee

I think it would look great but try to find a setting with a thin halo, it will look more delicate that way and the halo won’t overpower the centre stone. 

Post # 6
Member
131 posts
Blushing bee
  • Wedding: May 2017

To be honest, I think with step cuts it’s better to go big or go home.  They tend to face up smaller than brilliant cuts (at least asscher/square emerald does).  Also, they are not a sparkly cut… They “flash” more than sparkle.  Since you are going for a small carat weight, I’m afraid you won’t get any flash or sparkle (don’t be fooled by jewelry store lights.  Those could make a turd sparkle.).  My own personal opinion is that anything less than 1ct in a step cut is a disservice to the stone.  I have a 1.22 asscher and I regret going with this cut at that size.  It simply doesn’t sparkle or look very special.  I fell in love with step cuts after seeing really beautiful examples…. Only to find out that they were in the 2-3ct size range where you could really see and appreciate the steps, internal windmill pattern, and flashy personality under light.  I regret my decision, 100%…it’s actually led to a lot of strife about me not loving my ring and my FI feeling bad/inadequate about it.  If I were you, I’d look at a .5ct round brilliant in a Victorian style chunKy halo.  You get bling, style, and a halo at a good price! ex: http://trumpetandhorn.com/riviera.html

What being said, you should get WHATEVER makes you happy and causes your face to light up when you put it on.

Post # 7
Member
417 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: June 2015 - Historic house and gardens

I really don’t think Emerald cuts look great as a halo. Don’t get me wrong, I adore emerald cuts, I have one, but they sparkle differently as Woobee mentioned, so when you add a halo of a different cut it can look a bit messy. I really think you should go a bigger emerald cut alone, or add in other step cuts if you want more than one stone.

If you really want a halo, go round or oval.

Post # 8
Member
4133 posts
Honey bee
  • Wedding: June 2010

I think emerald cuts are awesome in halos! I think 0.5 is adequate but dainty 🙂

Post # 9
Member
295 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: May 2015

Ooh a thread made just for me! :p

While ‘waiting’ I was certain that I wanted an emerald cut ring, never considering a halo… until I saw this in a jewrllers window. It looks a little vintage, very classic and just feels like me.

My centre stone is 0.70 I think with a fine single halo and plain band. I will try to find a photo on my computer for you 🙂

Post # 10
Member
1117 posts
Bumble bee

Some people are not huge when it comes to sparkle and the typical round brilliant. This is the main reason I also chose an emerald cut. I love how it doesn’t try to get too much attention (but it still does actually lol) and definitely love the vintage feel! I have a vintage inspired E-ring 0.71ct. I know someone who got a 0.61ct and she’s size 4, and I thought it looked gorgeous! I’m a size 3.5 btw. Oh, I also feel like huge emerald cut look a little bit more like a candy but that’s just my personal opinion, so I would personally prefer something that’s 2ct or less. Here’s mine btw!

This photo with a black backround is not edited. It was just really bright in my room when I took this and the diamond reflected on the camera so bright that it turned everything on the background black.

Post # 11
Member
982 posts
Busy bee

Mrs.DK:  holy cow! Your ring (and set) is gorgeous!

Post # 12
Member
1117 posts
Bumble bee

Thank you so much Dogsbody92! Might not be everyone’s style, but I couldn’t be happier! 😀

Post # 13
Member
7618 posts
Bumble Beekeeper
  • Wedding: March 2014 - A castle!

Mrs.DK:  OMG that is beautiful!

Post # 15
Member
1532 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: February 2012

I love the idea of a .5 emerald cut diamond in a halo. Contrary to some opinions, I wouldn’t be influenced to go with another cut if you like step cuts.

I am in serious love with my emerald cut diamond and it flashes light beautifully (it is just over 1 carat). I have been lucky enough to have seen all sizes starting at less than 1/2 carat up to 2 – 3 carats and find them all decadent!

The topic ‘Is 0.5 too small for an emerald cut halo?’ is closed to new replies.

Get our weekly roundup of the best of Weddingbee.
I agree to receive emails from the site. I can withdraw my consent at any time by unsubscribing.

Find Amazing Vendors