(Closed) Is it rude to add… "Registered at…" to invitations?

posted 5 years ago in Paper
  • poll: Registered at
    RUDE... Don't include "Register at" in invitation : (31 votes)
    33 %
    I had it in my invitation... : (3 votes)
    3 %
    Included else were (blog, website, RSVP website) : (41 votes)
    44 %
    Doesn't bother me one way or another... : (18 votes)
    19 %
  • Post # 3
    509 posts
    Busy bee

    “Check out our wedding website at  URL” and put registries there. Yes, it is rude.

    Post # 4
    7208 posts
    Busy Beekeeper
    • Wedding: October 2015

    @Jacquelinesc84:  it depends on your circle. I’d ask older family members if they expect to see a registry card in the invite. Most bees are going to tell you it’s the rudest thing ever. Personally, I have never once received an invitation that DIDN’T have a registry card. 

    Post # 6
    3152 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: May 2018

    @Jacquelinesc84:  I thnk it is generally considered rude, but if it flies in your circle go for it. I think on a website it is generally more accepted. 

    Post # 7
    3256 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: August 2013

    Yes [/thread]

    We directed them to the website to RSVP, and the registry was on the site. Worded like a Charm.

    Post # 8
    3025 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: July 2014 - Prague

    Everyone will say yes, but as a wedding invitee, I personally wouldn’t care. I would assume that the couple was trying to be practical, not that they were tasteless.

    But if you have a wedding website, put it there instead. 

    Post # 9
    8695 posts
    Bumble Beekeeper
    • Wedding: September 2013

    @Duncan:  we did the same.


    registry was on our website and not the invitations

    Post # 10
    473 posts
    Helper bee
    • Wedding: May 2018

    Our registry was on our invite. 

    Post # 12
    17 posts
    • Wedding: December 2013

    I don’t see any problem with it. I actually find it more annoying when people don’t include details and I have to go searching for them. I would never attend a wedding without giving a gift, so the easier the bride and groom can make it for me to buy them something they actually want, the better! 

    Post # 13
    488 posts
    Helper bee
    • Wedding: September 2014

    It’s not unusual I don’t think in the UK 🙂 I wouldn’t put it on the main invite but include a slip in the pack. We do not seem to object as much as bees in America 🙂 x


    Post # 14
    6741 posts
    Bee Keeper
    • Wedding: June 2014

    I’ve never received a wedding invitation with it. Culturally, the bride gets gifts during the bridal shower and cash for the wedding. So, the bridal shower invite always has this little card in it that says “registered at…” but the wedding will not. Honestly, I don’t see a huge problem including that card in your wedding invites.

    Post # 15
    5423 posts
    Bee Keeper
    • Wedding: November 2012

    To me I wouldnt find it rude.  But it would probably crowd the invite a bit.  Personally, I prefer invites to be well-spaced.  I think its crisper.  If you registered at several places then its additional lines.  I have never received an invite with it directly on the invite.  They all had inserts.

    Post # 16
    553 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: September 2017

    As a guest to a wedding I’d prefer the invites to come with a registry notice added in the envelope. Don’t want to guess or call around to people trying to figure out where you’re registered. I also probably wouldn’t visit your wedding website (just being honest) to look and see if a registry is there. I like having all the info I need right in front of me at the same time. Could be my mild laziness lol

    The topic ‘Is it rude to add… "Registered at…" to invitations?’ is closed to new replies.

    Find Amazing Vendors