(Closed) It's official – I'm INSANE.

posted 6 years ago in Rings
Post # 3
Member
1089 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: May 2013

I prefer the first one 🙂 OR, If I were to get a split shank I would prefer one like this:

BUT, I also love this TAcori 2620:

Post # 4
Member
1698 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: July 2012

I prefer the first set for a more “traditional” look, as you can wear a wedding band with it.

The second ring is beautiful, but I think it could certainly be worn as a “stand alone” ring, an e-ring and wedding band all in one.

Overall I am biased towards the first ring because I prefer simplicity, but you have to choose what makes your heart sing. 🙂

Post # 5
Member
4979 posts
Honey bee
  • Wedding: October 2018

I prefer the simpler first one. It’ll put more focus on your center diamond!

Post # 6
Member
4352 posts
Honey bee
  • Wedding: August 2013

I prefer the first one because I think it would look better with a wedding band than the second one.

Post # 7
Member
4419 posts
Honey bee
  • Wedding: December 2010

The second one is beautiful, but your center stone would hide the diamonds that go under the  stone. so a lot of your diamonds will be hidden. 

Post # 8
Member
2903 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: January 2011

I like the first one best but if you decide on the second one I would not wear a wedding band with it.

Post # 10
Member
483 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: May 2012

I like the first one the best.  I think it showcases your center stone the best.

Post # 11
Member
1380 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: June 2009 - Mountain Meadow/Mansion

I also prefer the first setting! Love the simplicity and think it will showcase your stone beautifully! Also, I don’t think the TCW stands out as much as the center stone, so get what you like without worrying about how big it will look. Rock it!

Post # 12
Member
412 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: August 2014

I love the first one!

Post # 13
Member
100 posts
Blushing bee
  • Wedding: August 2013

Definitely the first one! The second has way to much going on!

Post # 14
Member
3173 posts
Sugar bee

The first one 🙂

Post # 15
Member
8 posts
Newbee

Although there seem to be a lot of votes for the first option— you seem to be moved by the second option.

While I understand the point of the ring is that third piece in the center— have you thought to leave it open (kind of like a split shank) and that way the wedding band could fit in that spot..that open space thereby creating that third band effect you seem to be wild over. That way it’s all flush—looks like one ring and you dont have to concern yourself with where to put the band.

Not sure if that made a bit sense….lol But I saw it in my head perfectly..lol

Post # 16
Member
3227 posts
Sugar bee

@soy:  I’m going to be honest here. If I was to get an oval of that size I would set it an a setting with tiny side stones (no halo) and double prongs. BUT it’s not my ring and although I think the first setting will make the center stone stand out more you seem to really love #2. So go for what you love! As far as a wedding band goes I would just wear a tiny thinbola in band because I wouldn’t feel the need for more bling. 

The topic ‘It's official – I'm INSANE.’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors