(Closed) Kim Kardashian engaged to Kanye

posted 8 years ago in Rings
Post # 47
Member
257 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: November 2013

I’m happy for them! They seem like they are actually a good match. The ring is so huge…I can’t imagine wearing that everyday! 

Post # 48
Member
190 posts
Blushing bee
  • Wedding: May 2014

I like Kim and Kanye. Yea I said it! lol. I just don’t get all the hate. Why spend so much time hating someone. Beyonce gets on my nerves, but I don’t go on rants about why she’s horrible and should be banned from the earth. I take what I like, leave what I don’t, and keep it moving. 

Post # 49
Member
386 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: October 2009

I hope she can handle Kanye. I like her ring; who says tasteful has to be dainty. It fits what she likes, and her surroundings. 

Post # 50
Member
456 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: June 2014

Hope that thing doesn’t get in the way when changing baby diapers -__-

Post # 51
Member
177 posts
Blushing bee

Guys, this was the most romantic proposal ever. In case you didn’t know, it went down like this:

Kanye: *Kneeling before Kim* Kim, I love you, will you marry me? *Pulls out ring*
Kim: *Gasps* Oh Kan–“
Kanye: Kim, I’m really happy for you, and I’m gonna let you finish, but I had one of the best proposals of all time. One of the best proposals of all time.

 

Post # 52
Member
3501 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: November 2012

Read this morning that it is a 15 ct D color IF cushion.  I hope they get married and bow out of the spotlight for a while to focus on their family, but I just dont see that happening.

Post # 53
Member
191 posts
Blushing bee
  • Wedding: September 2015

I just think it’s funny.

There’s a lot of celebs with big rings. But they’re tastefully big. This is cocktail jewelry, look at me stuff and it’s pointless. He could have gotten her something 5+carat to the same effect, but no, that’s too “understated.” The clothes are gaudy, the cars are gaudy, and the ring is gaudy.

It’s too bad, because she’s actually a cute girl and if she was normal, and her family was normal, she’d probably be much better off.

Post # 54
Member
188 posts
Blushing bee
  • Wedding: August 2015 - Country Club

To each his/her own. Seems like this time around she’s meeting her match…,, maayybe.

I saw the proposal clip last night, and it was absolutely amazing. Aahh the sweet sound of violin.

Post # 55
Member
849 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: June 2011

@Treejewel19:  In answer to your question about her last marriage, they’re officially divorced now (the judge granted it shortly before her baby was born). And I know this only because I watch their TV show as my guilty pleasure on Sunday nights. I’m a sucker for a bad reality show!

Post # 56
Member
4 posts
Wannabee
  • Wedding: February 2012

Is it me or does she not seem excited?

Post # 57
Member
1874 posts
Buzzing bee
  • Wedding: April 2013

@Twyla_Smith:  And I don’t get that. Maybe it’s different from state to state but I was NOT allowed a divorce while pregnant so the baby matters could be documented in the divorce decree.

I don’t care for Kim because it seems like she was a non-factor until her sex tape was released and then all of a sudden she gets a show. I don’t like how they are making her under 18 half sisters into sex symbols so early. Those girls are TOO skinny for me, they look anorexic. I don’t like how Kim told reporters she was divorcing her husband before her OWN husband even knows about it? She eats up paparazzi’s attention both her AND Kayne. I dont like how they just happened to be right across the street eating at the same time Reggie Bush and a female were eating… Coincidence? I dont think so. I think Kim texted Reggie to see where he was and either Kim or Kayne called paparazzi. And then what’s the deal with Kayne taking out the family of the paparazzi he punched and then running out on the ticket? WTH? I do think they both are made for each other. Both are shallow IMO.

Post # 58
Member
177 posts
Blushing bee

@lindseyl06:  Isn’t the baby Kanye’s? What baby matters need to be documented when the soon-to-be ex-husband isn’t the father of the baby? If he isn’t the biological father, I wouldn’t think he had any legal claim to the child, right? You were pregnant with your ex-husband’s child, which is probably why the rules were different.

If I am wrong that the baby is Kanye’s ignore my statement. The most I know about Kim is that she is on TV and does stuff with her sisters and doesn’t appear to be role-model material and that Kanye can’t create a song I enjoy listening to, ruined that Katy Perry song (thank GOD there are versions without him talking in it), and interupted Taylor Swift. I just am out of touch with all the celebrity whatnots from this decade. I pick up things here and there, which is unavoidable, but I’ve never actually sought out information on either of these two people. So again, if Kim’s baby is her ex-husband’s child, then ignore my statement. You seem to know far more about their lives than I do.

Post # 59
Member
1874 posts
Buzzing bee
  • Wedding: April 2013

@LynnSnow:  NO, I wasn’t pregnant with my ex-husband’s child but they still wanted the baby to be born so they could address the matters of the unborn child to cover all ground. It took over 2 1/2 years for our divorce to be final. The baby IS Kayne’s but I thought legally you were NOT allowed a divorce while pregnant. This is also what I am getting from news and my DH loves to watch the show but I don’t. I respect the hustle, but I do not agree with how they have handled some things in the public’s eye but to each its own.

Oh and to add what baby matters needs to be documented, it may be simple but they do have to cover it to cover their ass I guess but even if the child isn’t his, the divorce decree had to state so and that he has no ties to the child.

 

 

Post # 60
Member
217 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: June 2013

I can’t get behind or support someone who’s famous for getting peed on.

Post # 61
Member
177 posts
Blushing bee

@lindseyl06:  Is she still pregnant? Sadly money gives you access to faster results, and there are probably work arounds any law like that, that might be in place, but the lawyers who can/are willing to find those work arounds probably cost more than most people can afford in a divorce lawyer. I am only speculating at this point as I’ve not read any laws about this. Who knows what it could be.

There is probably something about being able to prove it isn’t the husband’s child, and I would assume that any law preventing divorce is not to punish the woman but to insure that the husband (who is probably usually the father) has to have responsiblity for the child if it is his. I could see a bunch of dead beat dad’s divorcing their wives after getting them pregnant and refusing to sign the birth certificate or something.

But again, only speculating. I’ve actually given this more thought and consideration than I really thought I would have. Oh well.

The topic ‘Kim Kardashian engaged to Kanye’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors