(Closed) Lunch or Dinner Reception? How did you decide?

posted 4 years ago in Reception
Post # 3
Hostess
12103 posts
Sugar Beekeeper
  • Wedding: May 2014

@MaryRachel:  I personally don’t get the lunch reception idea.  They just seem so weird to me and very casual.  I can’t see my guests dancing up a storm at 2:30 in the afternoon having a great party just to call it a day at 4:00?  That said, if you don’t want the ‘party’ atmospehere and would prefer no dancing and something more casual then lunch makes sense…

Post # 4
Member
4684 posts
Honey bee

Lunch is more casual, dinner is more formal. If you want a more casual reception with less dancing and alcohol, then choose lunch. If you’re into the big party scene, then go for a dinner reception.

Post # 6
Member
688 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: October 2013

I was open to any time of day but when it came time to decide, we ultimately wanted more of a party and an open bar..so night time it was!

Post # 7
Member
990 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: June 2013

@MaryRachel:  We chose the dinner reception and had the same kind of timeline you have. I wanted more time to get ready etc and not be so stressed on time the day of. Congrats and Best Wishes!

Post # 8
Member
10454 posts
Sugar Beekeeper
  • Wedding: February 2014

Dinner/dance just screams wedding to me. Go with dinner! 

Post # 9
Member
906 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: February 2014

I’ve been to wonderful afternoon receptions, but the truly memorable ones have all been dinner affairs. I think that’s because I’m a big fan of a dance party, though. Granted, I was once at an afternoon reception in Manhattan that involved the bride and groom (both investment bankers) dancing to “Gold Digger.” THAT was memorable.

The topic ‘Lunch or Dinner Reception? How did you decide?’ is closed to new replies.

Get our weekly roundup of the best of Weddingbee.
I agree to receive emails from the site. I can withdraw my consent at any time by unsubscribing.

Find Amazing Vendors