(Closed) Move before or after baby?

posted 4 years ago in Babies
  • poll: Move before baby or after?

    Before--it's worth paying out the lease

    After--save the money!

  • Post # 2
    337 posts
    Helper bee

    Moving with a newborn is a complete pain in the ass. You will be exhausted from lack of sleep, it will screw up your feeding schedule, you won’t have time to set the new place up and you won’t be able to help with the move because you will be taking care of the baby. 

    Could you possibly find anyone to take over your lease? Does your lease allow for that option? 

    Post # 4
    630 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: August 2015

    I’d recommend moving before! It’s so much easier before you have to deal with a baby, and you don’t have to worry about how they’ll adjust to a new place. The worst bit about moving with a baby though, is that it’s really hard to focus on finding a place, between the lack of sleep, the baby needing attention, and you and your husband adjusting to being parents.

    Post # 5
    1016 posts
    Bumble bee
    • Wedding: March 2015

    If you’re planning to rent for a year and then move *again*, is there really no way you could make your current place work for one more year? Could you get a storage unit to accommodate the stuff currently in the spare bedroom? Do you really have guests that often, and do you expect that to continue once you have a baby? Etc.

    Post # 6
    279 posts
    Helper bee
    • Wedding: May 2015

    I’m in a similar situation and we’re opting to move before. DH and I live in a 700 square foot apartment and are expecting baby in June. Our lease is up in July! We had planned to buy once our lease is up, but I’m NOT down with all the stress that I can just foresee coming with all that drama in that timeframe. We’re going to start looking at the beginning of December and just hope like heck that we can find something and be settled by at least April!

    It’s going to cost us 2 months’ rent to buy out our lease, but it’s worth it to me. DH suggested staying here and renewing our lease in July for 3 months so that we’d be moving when baby is 4 months old, but that still sounds awful, and I can’t imagine bringing baby home and trying to get settled and then having to do it all over again in such a short period of time. Nope nope nope. 

    Post # 7
    226 posts
    Helper bee
    • Wedding: June 2012

    I moved from the UK to the USA with a 3 month old, packed up 2 houses in England and lived in a hotel room for a month. Then with my 2nd I moved again, only 5 mins down the road but we did it all ourselves with a u haul.

    It is hard work but you can do it. Strap baby to your chest and off you go! It’s up to you but if saving money is important I think it is worth it :).

    Post # 9
    1254 posts
    Bumble bee
    • Wedding: October 2016

    View original reply
    liaeona :  If she wants to sell, you being out of there early may be a benefit.  Assuming you move in February and turn in the keys at the end of February that woudl give her March to get it ready to go on the market and then coudl have it on the market in April, which is the beginning of the real estate high season.  Might be worth asking your landlord about.  WHen my husband rented his house, we specifically made the lease end 2/28/18 for that reason!

    Post # 10
    4227 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: September 2015 - Hotel Ballroom

    I’m due in March too!

    DH and I aren’t looking at moving right now…but if we were I’d want to do it before the baby was born (physical limitations and all). My reason being I watched my friends who had a four month old baby at the time move to a bigger place, and it was complete HELL for them! 

    Post # 11
    9821 posts
    Buzzing Beekeeper
    • Wedding: August 2012

    A 2-3 month old baby doesn’t really need much “stuff.” You could get a small crib to go in your room for those couple of months and not even set up a nursery until you move.

    Do you have someone that is going to help you pack and move everything?

    Post # 12
    4252 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: February 2009

    before!  I have done both and it is easier to be done and settled before.  They do have a ton of crap, more than you expect.  And packing and moving with an infant is hard.  Not to mention just takking care of a 2-3 month old.  So you will basically be on your own with that while DH has to move your own house.  Oh yeah, on 4 hours of interupted sleep a night…  I would do it before.

    Post # 13
    758 posts
    Busy bee

    View original reply
    liaeona :  If you will definitely lose money on moving before, then move after baby is born. You should think also about how much you will be able to do at 35 weeks. You’ll be at the end almost and I think a move that late would be so nerve racking. At least if you move months after baby is born you can put baby in a carrier and do stuff. At 35 weeks my guess is you won’t be able to do that much and it will be very stressful when you are getting ready for baby.

    Post # 14
    300 posts
    Helper bee

    You just need a cot and possibly a changing table. There’s no need to set up a full blown nursery, but even if you do, I’d think a day is enough!

    Ultimately, I think it might be harder to move at the very end of your pregnancy than with a newborn.. if you will have lots of guests, surely you’ll find someone who can look after the baby when you deal with the move.

    Post # 15
    2120 posts
    Buzzing bee
    • Wedding: June 2014 - DD born 2015 DS born 2017

    I moved at 3 weeks pp and we had a 2-day drive. DH packed and unpacked everything up and did everything, and my baby was still such a tiny newborn she slept most of the way both days. It was pretty easy. We never had a nursery or planned on one since we bedshared, so that didn’t factor into anything. 

    Anyway it’s up to you but I’m saying moving with a newborn isn’t bad if your husband does everything!!!

    The topic ‘Move before or after baby?’ is closed to new replies.

    Find Amazing Vendors