(Closed) need honest opinions pretty please XD

posted 8 years ago in Decor
  • poll: To cover the chairs or not?

    yes cover them ugly things

    nope don't waste your money no one pays attention anyways

  • Post # 3
    7899 posts
    Bumble Beekeeper
    • Wedding: March 2012 - Pelican Grand Beach Resort

    @HisNightOwl2014:  They aren’t that bad and I ahte chair covers. If it’s important to your Future Mother-In-Law, she can pay the $300.

    Post # 4
    939 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: October 2012

    totally agree with pp. no need to cover but if its an issue for mil she can deal with it

    Post # 5
    11522 posts
    Sugar Beekeeper
    • Wedding: May 2009

    I think the color of those chairs would look fine with your color scheme, and the chairs themselves are not really unattractive.  (There definitely are chairs that I would want to cover, but I would not consider yours to be in that category.)

    Post # 7
    4951 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: October 2018

    I think the chairs are fine! They’re definitely not gorgeous, but they’re not bad either. 

    Post # 9
    285 posts
    Helper bee
    • Wedding: June 2013

    agree!! Leave em be.  They aren’t too bad, and they technically go with your colour scheme, plus I’m all about saving for the honeymoon.  Uncovered chairs won’t ruin anyone’s night! I’m doing the same with the ugly chairs at my venue – they are free to show their ugly selves, hahah

    Post # 10
    114 posts
    Blushing bee
    • Wedding: October 2012

    We opted to go without chair covers/bows, too!!   We thought it was silly to waste the money on them.  It was an extra $5 per chair that we saved!

    Post # 11
    126 posts
    Blushing bee
    • Wedding: January 2013

    Save the money

    Post # 12
    1397 posts
    Bumble bee
    • Wedding: July 2013

    they’re fine. don’t waste your money.

    Post # 13
    11736 posts
    Sugar Beekeeper
    • Wedding: November 1999

    They’re not the best looking things but I despise chair covers, so I’d leave them as is. 

    Post # 14
    655 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: December 2012

    Personally I think it would look better with chair covers, particularly in photos. But $300 does seem pretty steep for them. If you can source them for cheaper, I would.

    Post # 15
    6255 posts
    Bee Keeper
    • Wedding: March 2014

    I actually really like those chairs. Of course, my color scheme incorporates mint and gold, so it would look good, but I think it would look great with your blues as well. I would DEFINITELY put that money elsewhere. Chair covers would not be an improvement in this case.

    Post # 16
    1829 posts
    Buzzing bee
    • Wedding: January 2013

    Nobody gives a crap about how pretty the chair looks! The chairs are not BEAUTIFUL, but are nice for a wedding, not torn, or yellow/orange. They fit with your color scheme, people do not care how fancy the chair looks as long as they have a seat. If the chairs were super outdated, like bright yellow, or all torn, then I said cover them. This is not the case, use that extra money for your honeymoon. If your Mother-In-Law hates them that much, she can pay to cover them. I’m not covering my chairs, they are nice enough, and do the job intended, for people to sit, and still look nice for photos. Your all good girl. Good luck with your final decison.

    The topic ‘need honest opinions pretty please XD’ is closed to new replies.

    Find Amazing Vendors