(Closed) New Big Ten Logo/Division Names

posted 8 years ago in The Lounge
  • poll: How Do You Feel About the New Big Ten Logo?
    I think it's fine! : (2 votes)
    10 %
    I like the logo, but hate the division names. : (5 votes)
    25 %
    I hate everything about it! : (5 votes)
    25 %
    I hate the color. : (1 votes)
    5 %
    I love the color! : (0 votes)
    I love the division names! : (0 votes)
    Why is it still Big Ten? Aren't there 12 teams? : (3 votes)
    15 %
    Who cares??? : (4 votes)
    20 %
  • Post # 3
    3871 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: November 1999

    Oh, shoot, link doesn’t work for me because I’m at work. You mind telling me what they changed

    Penn State alum here!  Go Penn State!

    ETA: Oh, I found another link that is not blocked by my company.

    Here’s the new logo and it’s division changes.

    Oh, I also have to add that I’m also getting my master’s at Michigan State.  But, ehh, yeah I will always be blue and white! My boss says I should start sporting the green and white.  Uhh, nah!

    Post # 4
    929 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: October 2011

    Go Blue!  MIchigan grad here… But Fiance would know more about the logo than me ๐Ÿ™‚   

    Post # 6
    245 posts
    Helper bee
    • Wedding: March 2011

    I just think the new divisions names (Leaders & Legends) is sooooo cheesy.  I do like the fact that it doesn’t favor certain teams though.  I know they were considering naming them after specific coaches or mascots, which just isn’t fair. 

    The logo doesn’t bother me except for the fact that there are 12 teams in the Big TEN.

    Go Bucks!!

    Post # 8
    107 posts
    Blushing bee
    • Wedding: April 2012

    @littlecat Michigan grad here too! ๐Ÿ˜€

    Post # 9
    1801 posts
    Buzzing bee
    • Wedding: June 2010

    Well, I have no stake at all in this, but I find it comical.  It sounds like something high school divisions would do, and the logo is extremely sub-par for a collegiate conference with so much history and fervor around it. 

    ETA: I agree it would have been completely unfair to name the divisions after coaches or mascots.  Not to mention there’s a lot more to college conferences than football, so the coaches would have been doubly unfair. 

    Post # 10
    6015 posts
    Bee Keeper
    • Wedding: March 2012

    It’s certainly neutral.  It’s kind of boring. And Soonerpsych is right, there’s so much history that is not reflected in the logo.

    Post # 11
    18637 posts
    Honey Beekeeper
    • Wedding: June 2009

    @ttn133: You are a Penn State alum?  That’s where my parents went to school!

    Post # 12
    654 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: October 2011


    Yeah, we’re leaders. . . um yeah. 

    Post # 13
    3871 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: November 1999

    @MrsSaltWaterTaffy: Yup, class of ’06. Tell them I said hello. ๐Ÿ™‚

    Post # 14
    13096 posts
    Honey Beekeeper
    • Wedding: July 2010

    The logo is alright (kind of boring but whatever) but the division names are TERRIBLE!  Why not something like Great Plains and Great Lakes divisons or really anything other than Legends and Leaders?!?!

    I do find it kind of funny that the Big 10 now has 12 teams! ๐Ÿ™‚

    Post # 15
    57 posts
    Worker bee
    • Wedding: September 2009

    I hate it.  My husband went to Ohio State (GO BUCKS!) so naturally Im a fan of the conference.  But the logo and new division names are cheesy.  I hate how the “IG” is supposed to look like a 10.  I didnt see that until I read it.

    The topic ‘New Big Ten Logo/Division Names’ is closed to new replies.

    Find Amazing Vendors