(Closed) No MOH – dividing details so no one is upset?

posted 5 years ago in Bridesmaids
Post # 3
509 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: August 2014

I think it sounds fine, as long as it doesn’t get too complicated! Honestly for that sort of thing, I think people are being pretty unreasonable if they get mad about not getting one duty/privilege or another… it’s supposed to be an honour to be in the wedding party at all!

Post # 4
748 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: April 2014

I think that sounds fine… or you could just have K walk in and do all of those things, since she is the one you really want. That way she doesn’t have the title so no one can really get too upset about it, at least justifiably upset (not that I think it would be really justifiable, anyway).

Post # 5
451 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: November 2014

@Glasgowbound:  I like the idea of splitting the duties. The next thing is one might prefer to do one duty over the other two duties. I don’t have any BM’s or a Maid/Matron of Honor so I am still not sure what I would even do in a situation like this. All I can say is if you really want K do do the job, give her the duty that is most important to you.

Post # 6
1790 posts
Buzzing bee

Dividing them sounds fine.

Post # 7
4656 posts
Honey bee
  • Wedding: August 2013

I’ve got five and no Maid/Matron of Honor… dealing with similar issues, but my solution has actually been to *remove* tasks. No speech, etc. I’ll probably arrange them by height or figure it out when I see what dresses they picked and arrange them aesthetically by dress length/shade (since I told them to wear anything purple and tea length or shorter). 

So whoever just so happens to be standing closest will hold my parasol. 

The only semi-loaded task is the document signing, but somehow I feel it won’t really cause a lot of envy, “oh you wrote your name on a thing, so jelly” haha. Not likely with my crowd. 

The topic ‘No MOH – dividing details so no one is upset?’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors