(Closed) No photographer?

posted 9 years ago in Photos/Videos
Post # 3
44 posts
  • Wedding: June 2010

I think that in the end you are going to want a few pictures from your wedding. Your photog can just do candids that you don’t have to pose for and if you don’t want posed group shots that you have to stay behind for then you don’t have to get them. If it isn’t about the money I would just go for it because in the end you will like having them.

Post # 5
129 posts
Blushing bee
  • Wedding: July 2008

Mary_Alice_Me — I am so glad you decided to go with the photographer!!!

I know that you’re doing the right thing… it’s better to spend on a photog and hardly look at those photos, than to skip it and wish (forever) that you had had someone.


Post # 6
596 posts
Busy bee

I think you made the right decision!  You can definitely let your photographer know that you don’t want to spend a lot of time on posed shots and portraits.  You want to be having fun and mingling with guests during the wedding and you’d rather he find a way to capture the moments candidly and as uninstrusively as possible. 

We had a small reception with 40 guests and I am so glad we have professional pictures of us with our favorite people.  Even though our friends took a ton of pictures and shared them with us, the quality is definitely not the same!

The topic ‘No photographer?’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors