(Closed) not sure about this one.

posted 5 years ago in Rings
Post # 3
Member
441 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: August 2011 - St. Joseph's Parish, Seattle Tennis Club

Why are you concerned that it will look too small?

Post # 4
Member
9956 posts
Buzzing Beekeeper
  • Wedding: December 2012

As a pont of reference, in addition to the Jewellery Stock Photo you’ve posted, you might want to give us some more details (example what is the TCW, or the size of the feature diamonds in the Princess Quad Setting)

 

Post # 5
Member
860 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: November 2012

i dont have anything for you to compare to, but i am sure it will be amazing.

Post # 6
Member
9484 posts
Buzzing Beekeeper
  • Wedding: October 2012

@hannahmariee:  I think it’s a beautiful ring that will look amazing.

Post # 7
Member
2609 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: September 2011

Halos almost never look too small… they’re virtually INVENTED for finger coverage 🙂

Post # 8
Member
3627 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: September 2012

Is it already ordered and on its way? Why not post a picture when you get it? We can give better input then.

Post # 10
Member
441 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: August 2011 - St. Joseph's Parish, Seattle Tennis Club

@MissNoodles:  Ha yes! I love halos, but that is just my personal bias 🙂 

Post # 12
Member
1389 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: June 2009 - Mountain Meadow/Mansion

I think it is beautiful and will look just perfect on you! Post some pictures and show us when it comes in! 🙂

Post # 13
Member
4714 posts
Honey bee
  • Wedding: January 1998

usually when they have a quad setting they are bigger then a solitaire .75ct stone

Post # 14
Member
78 posts
Worker bee
  • Wedding: September 1999

Mine is very similar. My finger size is an 8 with all 3 bands soldered together. So, if you can visualize my ring without the ruby band that’s probably about the finger coverage you should expect.

 

Post # 15
Member
3228 posts
Sugar bee

@hannahmariee:  I don’t think you should worry. I think it will look perfect. And halos generally proivide great finger coverage.

Post # 16
Member
9956 posts
Buzzing Beekeeper
  • Wedding: December 2012

@hannahmariee:  Thanks for the additional info that is very helpful.

I don’t have a Quad Ring, although I certainly fell in love with them when I first was looking (soooo fell in love with an Angled Quad that I saw on Vacation, but never did see again anywhere else)

I too was looking for similar sizing… .75 center, and between 1.5 and 2.0 TCW.

As the others say the coverage should be good…

I ended up with a cocktail style ring… and I have a size 7 finger, and my feature stone is just over 3/4 Ct. and it looks great on my otherwise short and stubby fingers.

I would say that the picture that  @missmuffin72:  has provided is an excellent example of what you can expect overall.

 

 

The topic ‘not sure about this one.’ is closed to new replies.

Get our weekly roundup of the best of Weddingbee.
I agree to receive emails from the site. I can withdraw my consent at any time by unsubscribing.

Find Amazing Vendors