(Closed) okay ladies what do you consider a small wedding?

posted 8 years ago in Waiting
  • poll: whats a small weeding to you?
    100 ppl : (9 votes)
    4 %
    75-100 ppl : (38 votes)
    18 %
    50 ppl : (164 votes)
    77 %
    200 ppl : (2 votes)
    1 %
  • Post # 3
    Member
    149 posts
    Blushing bee
    • Wedding: December 2012

    I think over 100 is quite a bit. Over 200 is a lot. I think 50 is moderately small.

    Post # 4
    Member
    11378 posts
    Sugar Beekeeper
    • Wedding: December 2010

    My husband & I had a really small wedding with 20 some people being close family only. 

    Post # 5
    Member
    682 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: November 2011

    our final head count is 38 and I find that moderately small. Not as intimate as I would have liked, but still small enough that I can speak with each guest. Make sense?

    Post # 7
    Member
    2889 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: July 2013

    To me a small wedding is under 50 say 12-40 people. I think 50-120 is average at least around here 🙂

    Post # 8
    Member
    6512 posts
    Bee Keeper
    • Wedding: September 2012

    I think 50 and under is small.  I am thinking our wedding will be around 100, which I think is a good size – not too big, but still a fun party with a lot of our good friends around us. 

    Post # 9
    Member
    273 posts
    Helper bee
    • Wedding: November 2012

    I really wanted to put less than 50!  My SO and I have been considering a tiny destination wedding (only immediate family and our two besties who are convieniently married to each other).  We think it would be awesome to go all out and pay for the ones we love the most to take an amazing vaca with us.  We would still have a reception when we got home for business associates, college friends, and Out of Town family.

    Post # 10
    Member
    1493 posts
    Bumble bee
    • Wedding: October 2009

    50-60 and under I consider small. We had 100 people at our wedding. It was just right for us. Not too big, not too small. We were able to mingle and talk to our guests throughout the night without feeling overwhelmed. My brother’s and best friend’s weddings were in the 150-200 range. It felt a little overwhelming at times in the big venue with lots of people and sometimes not really knowing everyone as well.

    Post # 11
    Member
    7776 posts
    Bumble Beekeeper

    Under 100.

    Post # 12
    Member
    2892 posts
    Sugar bee

    None of the above.

    Whenever I talk about a small wedding I’m talking about way less than 50. Like 30 and under if I got my way.

    Post # 13
    Member
    3798 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: June 2012

    50 or less…although sometimes, based on what I read/see about weddings, under 100 is considered small.

    Post # 14
    Member
    3148 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: August 2012

    It’s hard.  We are having 50.  And some people call that small and others say that’s not small.  haha

    Post # 15
    Member
    7172 posts
    Busy Beekeeper

    I ended up with 125 and it was small for me.

    Other people would think that was a big wedding, but considering I wanted around 250-300 (just couldn’t afford it!), it was my compromise.

    As a wedding guest, I think anything under 100 is small.

    Post # 16
    Member
    2700 posts
    Sugar bee

    I think under 100 is small. Our guest list was 60 but we had about 55 people come. I wouldn’t have wanted it any larger than 60, too many people!

    The topic ‘okay ladies what do you consider a small wedding?’ is closed to new replies.

    Find Amazing Vendors