Post # 1
Because I’m incredibly indecisive and would like some more opinions before choosing, please give your opinions.
P.S. I would like to stack whichever band I choose with other ‘relationship-milestone’ rings.
Ring 1 – Vintage-looking, has a few very small diamonds, seems a little thin ($175 – $209)
Stock photo –
Real-life photo by wannabe-diy-bride:
Ring 2 – Less detailed, sturdier design, no diamonds, Irish scroll design (symbolizes love, loyalty and friendship) ($ 210)
Stock photo –
Real life photo (this photo and ring belongs to a Bee whose name I can’t recall; please accept my apologies and feel free to claim ownership) –
So which is it Bees? Please post photos if you have as well. Thank you!!!
Post # 3
- Wedding: October 2014 - Vegas baby!
I prefer the first one, I think it’s very pretty and delicate. On the other hand, it looks like it may be too delicate. But it’s gorgeous!
Post # 4
I like the first one better if it were to be worn alone, but for stacking, I like the second one.
Post # 5
That filigree is so cool!
Post # 7
I am the lone voter for ring 2. sigh… I just feel like if you’re going to stack it, I like the non- blingy.
Post # 8
I like the first one best but it looks too small with the 3 stone in the picture.
Post # 9
@Someday_Mrs_Maguire: Exactly. It’s beautiful but I’m concerned its delicate nature will mean it is overpowered by other rings in the stack and that it cant be worn alone or hold up well over time. It’s so pretty though..
@quin24: Yeah, I also feel while 1 is prettier, 2 may stack better.
@Mrs Canuck: Lol…nope…some more persons have joined the #2 party. 🙂 I agree about stacking a less blingy ring also. It should compliment the stack rather than compete with it.
Grrrrrr….I’m still so confused. Some more real life pics or a review from an owner of either ring would be great but it’s been hard finding those.
Thanks so far guys.
Post # 10
I love the first one. It was a top contender when I was choosing a band.
Post # 11
- Wedding: October 2014 - Disney
I like both of these rings but not with the rings in the photos.
Post # 12
*bump* Any more to add guys?