(Closed) Opinions on this Wedding set please.

posted 6 years ago in Rings
Post # 3
1426 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: March 2013

For my taste, there’s too much going on. Too much diamond action and I’m not a fan of the swirling wedding band design. I know it’s that way to accomodate the engagement ring, but it’s just too much for my taste. Sorry.

But, if it’s what your sister likes, then that’s all that matters!

Post # 4
696 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: July 2013

Very pretty! It looks very feminine and bridal. I personally love white gold but if yellow is her style then that is great and Im sure it will look great in either. I think 1ct is perfect and I would not go any larger for a size 5 finger…good choice girls 🙂

Post # 5
2607 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: September 2011

Not a fan.  The gold around the stones is so thick, and I don’t care for the double contoured band.

Tell us what she really likes about it, and maybe we can make suggestions?  IS it the channel set stones, is it the three stone style?  Does she specifically want a contoured set?

This one is a similar style, but the band can be worn on it’s own, 



And if it’s the contour style she likes, this one is much more delicate


Post # 8
494 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: August 2014

I too personally prefer white gold, but we’re all different.  It is a bit thick, but does your sister have long fingers?  if so, maybe it’s not that bad.  it’s slightly busy for my taste.  Too bad we didn’t have a pic on someone finger.  sometimes it’s hard to tell if you really like something from the web pics.  it always looks different on. 

Post # 9
2031 posts
Buzzing bee
  • Wedding: July 2012

@jennypop:  The engagement ring is pretty, but I don’t care for the set together…I’d rather have a flat band with a gap, but that’s me.  


@MissNoodles:  I love both of those!  The second one looks beautiful, and I hate bands that aren’t flat!  I need to stay off of this site, because I always want something new LOL.

Post # 10
11752 posts
Sugar Beekeeper
  • Wedding: November 1999

I think it is really hard to tell from the stock images – definitely see if you can find a real life picture of it or order it and check it out (as long as there is a decent return policy!)

Post # 12
2607 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: September 2011

@jennypop:  “Second one you listed looks like an old lady ring”

Agreed actually… I find contoured sets to be a very dated look in general… just trying to throw some options out there since it seems to be what your sister wants.

Post # 13
3227 posts
Sugar bee

@jennypop:  For me it’s too busy and I really dislike curved bands because of how they look alone. I’d prefer one center stone and some diamonds if need be but in the end what matters is that you like it. 

Post # 14
1676 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: June 2011

Since you asked for opinions, I don’t like it all. It looks very bulky and, TBH, manish to me. Sorry. 

Post # 15
395 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: December 1969

The blending of the prongs AND bezely-things AND channel (?) settings is way too much for my taste. I’d be like “pick a team!” lol, what kind of setting do you want to be? Too much going on, I think it is ugly. Also it will be relatively thick for a size 5 finger, but then I wear a 6mm plain band and love it (size 5-5.5 finger).

The wedding band bumps look like boobies. /-:

Rings look much better with no more than two different types of settings (e.g., prongs with pave).

HOWEVER, the only opinion that matters is your sisters. If she loves it, she should go for it. All us ladies saying it’s ugly can go jump in a creek lol.

Post # 16
2903 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: January 2011

I like the e-ring but the band bothers me for some reason…

But if she loves it tell her to go for it





The topic ‘Opinions on this Wedding set please.’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors