(Closed) Pay for lighting or use a different ceremony space?

posted 7 years ago in Ceremony
  • poll: What would you do?
    Use two different spaces for ceremony and reception. : (3 votes)
    33 %
    Pay for lighting and flip the room! : (6 votes)
    67 %
    Other. : (0 votes)
  • Post # 3
    Member
    726 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: June 2012

    I love the second one, and I love the lighting. I think useing the same room would be just fine!

    Post # 4
    Member
    9029 posts
    Buzzing Beekeeper
    • Wedding: June 2011

    LIghting can be verys expensive so if its the same price to rent another venue I might do that instead and not have to deal with the stress of having both ceremony and reception in one room

    Post # 5
    Member
    141 posts
    Blushing bee
    • Wedding: July 2011

    I think that lighting can really transform a room so I’d go for it if you have the funds/ it will make you happy.

    …but I think the ceremony space looks really nice. Have you compared costs of lighting to adding more elaborate floral decorations and candles to the ceremony space provided?

    Post # 7
    Member
    1991 posts
    Buzzing bee
    • Wedding: October 2011

    Can you afford to pay for the lighting and have the room flipped? If not, then you may want to stick with the original space.

    With that being said, it looks great with the lighting, but I’m sure it would be just fine without it. You could just not get lighting and have the room flipped.

     

    The topic ‘Pay for lighting or use a different ceremony space?’ is closed to new replies.

    Find Amazing Vendors