Post # 1
Ok ladies- I have 2 photographers that are located around me…. one of them was my TOP pick for pictures but the other I have know the photographer for years & they are offering me a pretty good deal…. Im not so sure how I feel about this photographers photos? I feel like they are amature? *side note… I take pics as a hobby and have done kids & Seniors for free so I feel like these are photos I could take myself and edit myself* HOWEVER I want to get opinions of others that do not know either of these photographers to see if I’m being bias towards the first one I picked and maybe need to step back and take a different look at the quality of prints etc. OR If what Im thinking is the same as others?!
About the packages…. prices are similar excpet one gives a CD with a release & the other does NOT because they feel like they want their work on REAL & Quality photo paper that isnt blurry or cheap like Walmart or wherever else youd print those from a CD….
The links to their websites are below PLEASE vote for Photographer 1 or 2 & give me your personal opinions below of the samples on their sites! Thanks sooo much ladies!
Post # 3
The second one does look a bit amateur. Good pictures, but nothing your average joe or jane couldn’t do with a point and shoot and some editing software. The first one seems much better of the two.
I’m not a photographer, nor do I have any experience with it. Just my two cents 🙂
Post # 4
In all honesty, I’m not a fan of either one. The photos aren’t bad or anything, the editing just doesn’t do it for me.
As for the “quality photo paper” if they provide you with digital negatives you can easily have them printed on the same paper professionals use.
Post # 5
I like the quality of the first studio’s samples better; the setups and lighting are a bit better.
Post # 6
I think you should go with the first one. Because it seems that they have more skills in photography, and the second seems amature. The benifit of the second would be to have the CD, but if the photo quailty isnt great then it isnt work it. However the second photographer wasnt to bad. So if you want quality then go with the first one, but if you want the Convenience of having a CD go with second.
Post # 8
Personally I don’t care for either. I like photographers that add more of an artistic view to pictures.
I think the first one takes great portraits, some of them were so pretty.but they also had some photos that looked amature to me. Honestly, If you put both photographers pictures together in a pile and asked me to seperate which one belong to which photographer, i couldn’t do it.