Post # 1
Pages for the rings:
I opened a similar thread earlier but i realized the first image that pops up on the james allen page was a nice video rather than a lower quality photo on the blue nile page. This time I linked at the top a view of the ring from the top to see what people like better in a more comparable way. I want to see if most people recommend the same ring here
Post # 2
I still like te James Allen better simply because the sapphire is more subtle. If your girlfriend wants a ring where the blue is front and center then go with the Blue Nile. I just prefer the style of the JA one more.
Post # 4
James Allen one is much nicer IMO! Best of luck!
Post # 5
I like the blue nile one, as long as you are sure she wants blue sapphires in her ring I think its lovely. I dont like the marquise cut sapphires in the james allen one.
Post # 6
James Allen!! Did she explicitly ask for blue sapphires? Going for a colored stone is a huge risk unless she deliberately wants it. It’s beautiful!
Post # 7
James Allen!! It’s beautiful
Post # 8
I prefer the James Allen. I feel like the band is more unique and eye-catching. If she tends to prefer a simpler look go for the Blue Nile ring.
Post # 9
Looks like I’m the only one, but I like the Blue Nile better – Mostly beacuse I am not a huge fan of the band on the James Allen (that twirly sort of look where the band dips in and out around the stones).
The Blue Nile is streamlined and absolutely gorgeous. I’m a huge sapphire fan as well, and this ring makes them a bit more prominent without totally overshadowing the main stone.
Post # 10
James Allen for sure. I think the white/blue design on the Blue Nile one is a bit expected.
Post # 12
Still vote for James Allen. I think you should close the other thread though so avoid confusion (don’t have to just a recommendation ).
Post # 14
Love the James Allen ring!
Post # 15
Do you already have a diamond? If so, what size and shape?
I’m going to go against the trend and say that I dislike both. Why? Sapphires have a lower refractive. When this tiny and mass-cut as these are, you only get color — not much sparkle or fire. The cut on these stones is just to native (vs. precision) to give the stone much sparkle an life.
First, replaced the blue sapphires with blue diamonds. It may cost a bit more, but you’ll get more life out of the small stones. Retail, a blue diamond melee is about $15 more than colorless for each stone. Or…just go for a sapphire and diamond ring. A larger stone will have more room to shine and really “BE” sapphires, instead of little blue dots.
Like this: https://www.jamesallen.com/engagement-rings/three-stone/14k-white-gold-three-stone-trillion-shaped-blue-sapphire-engagement-ring-item-22618
All else being equal, I prefer JA over BN for the quality of the setting and confidence in their selection of and setting of sapphires. You do have to keep on them about making their prongs delicate and refined.
One last idea, if you got this setting, you could choose a round sapphire to go in the middle (or diamond).
Ritani is a really nice quality setting and will be more substantial than either the JA or BN you choose. This is a much better quality setting than the BN by a mile.