(Closed) Please help me decide!

posted 9 years ago in Rings
  • poll: Which ring should I get?

    Cushion with Petite Halo

    Embrace Cushion Halo

    Cushion Halo with Split Shank

  • Post # 3
    Member
    3000 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: July 2012

    I love the last one! But I’m biased since I have a cushion cut in a halo with a split shank πŸ™‚

    Post # 4
    Member
    4108 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: December 2011

    The last one, I’m not sure exactly why over the others though. I really like the side profile.

    Post # 6
    Member
    88 posts
    Worker bee
    • Wedding: August 2013

    Halo with a split shank!!! πŸ˜‰

    Post # 7
    Member
    3063 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: November 2012

    I fell in love with the petite setting recently, but when I inquired about it they said it’s about 1.5mm and I just don’t think that’s durable for everyday wear. This would be a lovely choice though, if you’re planning on upgrading again in the future! Or if you don’t plan on wearing it all the time. The Embrace is also really gorgeous, but for durability I would certainly go for the last one. That and I love the side detailing and the split shank! Very pretty! 

     

    I actually happen to have a photo of the Embrace in different stone shapes that I saved to my computer a few months ago. The stones are Ashas though, not Moissanite, but same exact setting. 

     

    Post # 9
    Member
    6891 posts
    Busy Beekeeper
    • Wedding: March 2012

    I really like the first, though the split-shank is a close second in my book! Of course they are all gorgeous. Duh. πŸ™‚

    Post # 10
    Member
    4108 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: December 2011

    View original reply
    @6598731ssfse3: Ok, I change my answer to the Embrace πŸ™‚ Looking at the photos again, I think I prefer that one because the halo seems to sit alittle higher off the band than the others.

    OP: They are all gorgeous though- I’m not really sure you can go wrong here. Congrats on your anniversary btw. I see you are not a regular poster so I hope you come back to share real life photos when you get it! The new videos help a bit, but I think Moissaniteco’s only letdown (regarding thier website only) is that there aren’t individual reviews or customer photos/videos available for each product. Considering how beautiful the stones are, I think this could help thier business a great deal.

    Post # 12
    Member
    3063 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: November 2012

    Bronte –  It doesn’t just apply to halos. Any ring that has a thin shank (band) has a greater risk of being damaged than a ring that is 2mm or more in thickness because with less metal there is less support/strength. Especially when the thin band has stones on it. You could, for instance, be walking around at work and bump your ring on a metal filing cabinet and then the metal is bent. Or it could simply warp with time. The chance of this happening is less when the shank is thicker. Here’s a good thread I read recently discussing it. πŸ™‚

    http://www.pricescope.com/forum/rockytalky/are-rings-too-thin-these-days-t155780.html

    Post # 13
    Member
    2114 posts
    Buzzing bee
    • Wedding: November 2012

    My vote is the second one

    Post # 14
    Member
    24 posts
    Newbee
    • Wedding: January 2012

    My vote would be the last one…or the first one, but that’s just because I’m not a huge fan of very visible halo’s. I like it when they’re more subtle. Gorgeous rings though, you have excellent taste!

    Post # 16
    Member
    3774 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: December 2004

     I really like the first one.  They are all beautiful though, so you can’t go wrong.

    The topic ‘Please help me decide!’ is closed to new replies.

    Find Amazing Vendors