(Closed) Rant: I hate when wedding vendors list their prices as “investments”

posted 10 years ago in Money
Post # 3
Member
2933 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: May 2012

Generally speaking, I invest in something that could essentially give me a financial return at some point.  

Pictures do not do that.

 

I agree with you 🙂

Post # 4
Member
2584 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: October 2011

haha!! I may just be slow, but when I was first doing my photographer research and looking for the prices, I could NOT find them.  I finally clicked on “Investments” and low and behold, there it was…I guess I should have known that “Investments” mean pricing. duh.

Post # 5
Member
2896 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: November 1999

I agree. Just say prices. Let’s call a spade a spade. 

Post # 6
Member
1713 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: December 2011

ITA with PPs

…but I do want to invest my money in the right photographer to make my ‘investment’ worth my wild even in 15 – 20 years.

Post # 7
Member
1314 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: December 2011

Ugh one of my bigger wedding-related pet peeves. Like ryansgirl, at first I didn’t realize that investment = pricing and felt really dumb. Then I just got annoyed.

Post # 8
Member
1472 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: November 1999

I’m with you. I understand the rationale, but it also sounded a little pretentious to me. If I wanted to invest in your business, I would…I just want to pay money in exchange for goods and services. In my mind, that is not an investment. My photos are not a “return”–they’re what I am paying for!

@Ryansgirl:  It also took me awhile to figure out what it meant!

Post # 9
Member
1023 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: October 2012

@jackndiane: THANK YOU. UGH. Generally when I see the word “investment” I move right along. And typically “investment” vendors are more pricy than the “pricing” ones. Just my personal experience.

 

Post # 10
Member
3457 posts
Sugar bee

OP, totally agree with you!! It’s neither clever nor cute.

Post # 11
Member
3282 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: January 1993

When I saw that on a website I instantly thought ‘expensive’.

Post # 12
Member
6377 posts
Bee Keeper
  • Wedding: October 2011

Our photographers pricing was listed as “Investment” on his site. To be honest, it didn’t even phase me until this thread. We still booked him and he did a great job. 

Post # 13
Member
6610 posts
Bee Keeper

I don’t mind the phrase “Investment.” I understand the logic behind the choice.

However, I agree that when I saw “Investment” on a website, I read “expensive.”

Post # 14
Member
1150 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: May 2011

I mean, photos are kind of an investment if you think of it from the standpoint that you get what you pay for and you want to make sure you invest in a good wedding photographer. When photographers say investment they obviously don’t mean you are going to put money in and potentially make money…but your photos are really the only tangible you keep after the wedding so it makes sense to, well “invest” in them if you will. Cool

Post # 15
Member
6610 posts
Bee Keeper

@kate169:  I agree! Wedding photos are a big enough deal and have enough sentimental “value” in the future, that I could consider the price an “investment.” I get it. But I also get why it bugs people. 🙂

The topic ‘Rant: I hate when wedding vendors list their prices as “investments”’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors