Recommendation for wedding band with intricate e-ring

posted 4 months ago in Rings
Post # 2
Member
711 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: March 2020

I’d hate to cover up that pretty side view, personally. I’d either stick with the engagement ring alone, wear a wedding band on my right hand or stack the wedding band on the outside rather than inside. 

Post # 3
Member
1463 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: September 2021 - Australia

have you got pictures of the options you mention?

Without photos, I’m leaving towards the matching wedding band. It maybe a bit more pricey, but I feel like it’s a lifelong investment and worth the extra money. 

Post # 4
Member
84 posts
Worker bee

I vote matching band or no band/band on right hand. With an intricate ring like yours, my personal preference is no band. I find most bands end up competing, and the overall look becomes too busy, but that’s just my take.

Post # 5
Hostess
2552 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: February 2005 - Shreveport, LA

I love your ring….I would do a thin pave low profile ring. My friend has a Tacori and did this so it doesn’t cover the details and it looks great from the top and doesn’t cover anything from the side! 

 

Post # 6
Member
1370 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: October 2010

Matching band! You won’t regret it! 

Post # 7
Member
304 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: April 2022

I have the same issue and will be going down the thin low profle ring rather than pay for the crazy expensive matching band. I also love my side profile but I’ve also got the added potential scratchy side diamonds that make me doubt whether the matching band + ering wont erode against each other 

Post # 8
Member
10704 posts
Sugar Beekeeper

View original reply
@Sprinklespark:  

l would go for a plain white gold /platinum band with a milgrain edge. I think a matching band would be a bit too much ( but that’s just me) . I am not keen on the no wedding ring option  and there will be times where it’s not convenient or you don’t want to wear your engagement ring and a nice plain ish wedding ring alone looks great. 

Post # 9
Member
511 posts
Busy bee

I agree with the PPs suggestions of a thin low profile band. Maybe half eternity, if you want the extra sparkle, although a plain band would look really good against all the bling as well. Something like this would look really good too. It’s on Etsy, and comes in both silver ($55) and 14k wg ($315) so you could try silver before deciding 

https://www.etsy.com/listing/204684327/rose-gold-milgrain-white-stone-ring

 

Post # 10
Member
511 posts
Busy bee

Also, FWIW, I don’t see anything wrong with wearing a super blingy matching  wedding band on the right hand or none at all. It won’t make you less married. I went a couple of  years without wearing a band before I found one I liked (curved, in my case). Sometimes I’d wear a wedding style band on my right, sometimes another pretty ring. You do what looks and feels best to you.

Post # 11
Member
1443 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: September 2016

I would need to see the matching band to be sure, but I agree that a low profile wedding band would work

Post # 13
Member
47 posts
Newbee

View original reply
@Sprinklespark:  

I would get the matching ring! It’s beautiful! You could always get a simple, low profile band until you’ve had time to save for the matching band.

Leave a comment


Find Amazing Vendors