(Closed) Ridonkulous vintage diamond ring!

posted 7 years ago in Rings
Post # 3
Member
2091 posts
Buzzing bee

Oh hell that is one big ring! Very pretty.

ETA: Am I the only one who doesn’t mind inclusions? If I had a diamond I think I would actually want some type of visible inclusion, it sort of makes it that much more unique and visibly “yours”, if that makes any sense.

Post # 4
Member
2522 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: November 2013

I love that pear shaped diamond listed below!  It seems like that massive diamond has a bunch of inclusions which turn me off to it. Plus if you truly got that ring, I wonder how many people would believe it’s real b/c it kind of looks constume-y.

Post # 5
Member
2522 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: November 2013

@Gingersnap: I don’t mind inclusions but this ring kind of looks dirty from the inclusions. Idk?

Post # 6
Member
2091 posts
Buzzing bee

@beekiss: True, it does a little. Still a gorgeous rock though!

Post # 7
Member
374 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: June 2012

i dunno i don’t think i’d like inclusions in my diamond but that’s just me!

 

and yes that’s a big bad a** diamond!

Post # 8
Member
369 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: September 2011

Love it!  I really don’t mind inclusions either, but I tend to subscribe to the whole “finding beauty and character in the flaws” theory. 

Post # 9
Member
3049 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: January 1991

@Gingersnap: I have visible inclusions in my ring. I have one or two (I can’t tell if it’s a different inclusion or just showing from a different side). When I look at it under a loop it just looks like little crystals. But from naked eye it’s just a dot. I like it, and it lets me know… “Hey this is my diamond” so I can tell when I bring it into the jeweler.

That diamond is so big that it looks really scratched from the inclusions. It’s impressive though, and still a lot of money. Dang! 🙂

Post # 10
Member
6394 posts
Bee Keeper
  • Wedding: September 2011

I can’t imagine wearing a ring that large, that just looks cumbersome! 

Post # 11
Member
1684 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: October 2011

my finger just cramped out of sympathy. I couldn’t wear that!!

Post # 12
Member
4547 posts
Honey bee
  • Wedding: September 2010

Wowzers!

Post # 13
Member
1723 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: June 2012

Wow! That’s huge!  My biggest problem is they want you to pay shipping after you’ve spent $121,000!!!

Post # 14
Member
2600 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: June 2011

Yeah, it’s pretty funny you have to pay for shipping.

That would look AWESOME on my hand 🙂  My mom has a blue topaz that size that she got years and years ago.  Every time she has it worked on or cleaned jewelers make her an offer to buy it.

My engagement ring is vintage and filled with inclusions.  I love it.  I know it’s my stone.  It’s larger, somewhere around 2 carats maybe, not sure.  Larger than his grandfather should have been able to afford for his grandma – which I’m sure is why it isn’t ‘perfect’. 

Perfect to me 🙂

 

Post # 15
Member
145 posts
Blushing bee
  • Wedding: October 2011

My jeweler said that inclusions and rough cut stones are becoming the “in” thing.  My ring is made of a stone my fiance and I found together.  Why not have character, right?

Post # 16
Member
299 posts
Helper bee

I have a diamond necklace Fiance gave me a few years, and the diamond has a very obvious inclusion.  I was showing it to a friend, and she said she wished her engagement center stone had been more interesting and had something like that.  People do like them.

The topic ‘Ridonkulous vintage diamond ring!’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors