Post # 1
Well…. Nerd and I have been talking about rings and next weekend we are going to be going ring shopping again and I have a few rings that I am trying to pick between. But I need some outside opinions. These are the ones that I like. My hand is 5 inches high from heel to top of middle finger and I wear a size 9, although having tried them on in store, they seem to be just the right size for my finger.
Option 1: (1/2 CT, halo is flush with center stone)
Option 2: (1/2 CT, each halo is flush with stones)
Option 3: (1/2 CT, has engraving inside ring that says “Past, Present, Future”)
Option 4: (5/8 CT, halo is flush with center stone)
Also, I have the option with the 3-stone ones replacing the side stones with other stones, which I may also do, because I have always liked coloured stones.
Which would you pick? Do you have one similar? Want to share your pictures with your wedding bands as well?
Thanks for any input!!!!
Post # 3
I chose option 3. The others don’t look like halos to me – rather they look like cluster rings, which I’m not personally a fan of.
Post # 4
I chose #2! Im a fan of pave bands, and I like that the stones are similar in size. My opinion though, all the rings are lovely 😉
Post # 5
@adoc86: I guess they are more cluster, but the stones in the center are much bigger which is why I’m calling them halos.
@Girasole: Thanks! Obviously they have similar aspects but I seem to be bad at dtermining what is tacky/gaudy/fashionable.
Post # 6
@Booknerd: none of them are gaudy to me, my personal style is usually more sparkle the better and im OCD about size and such. 🙂
Post # 7
I like option 3…very elegant!
Post # 8
3! you can’t go wrong with that classic look. The others remind me of “fashion rings” like my first e-ring.
Post # 9
I like #2 the best but they’re all really beautiful. You can’t go wrong with whichover one you choose.