Post # 1
My SO and I have been together for almost 6 years, I love him and I know i want to (and will) spend the rest of my life with him.. I am thinking of suprising him soon with getting his first initial tattooed under/behind my left ear.. (I already have our dog’s name tattooed on my foot)..
Im wondering if this is a nice way to show him how much he means to me or is it just weird? We aren’t engaged but we talk about getting married all the time.. I know he loves me just as much as I do and I guess I just want to show him HOW MUCH!!
Post # 3
i think your going to get many different oppinions on this one, me and my Fiance are very tattoo’d people but we have agree’d never to get eachothers names, personal choice nothing against what you want to do for us we just dont want to have that kind of work done. I did draw a full back peice for my Fiance and he has my art forever tattoo’d on him so he is commited to carrying a part of me with him forever we just feel like a name is something were not interested in doing. I think if its truly what you want then go ahead, just do what you know in your heart is right for you and your boyfriend, and perhaps talk to him first?
Post # 4
I wouldn’t. I do plan to get our birth flowers tattooed on me though.
Post # 5
I don’t have any tattoos at all, but the only scenario that I can see being inspired to get one, is maybe if I had a child that died… morbid, but so far the only thing I can think of as meaningful, and permanent enough to know for sure I’d want it forever.
Post # 6
I personally would not do such a thing. I currently have two small tattos that represent two people very close to me that have passed away. If it is truly something you have spent a long time thinking about and its what you really want then go for it.
Post # 7
If it’s something that you think he would truly appreciate and it’s something you know for sure that you want, then go for it. I have my fiance’s first initial inside one of my tattoos. It wasn’t something we planned on, it was something he suggested the day before I got it done, and I don’t regret it. I would never get someone’s entire name tattooed on me though.
Post # 8
Hmm that’s a tough answer- I don’t think it’s weird to do something like that and it is quite a meaningful way to carry a “piece” of him. It’s ultimately your personal preference!
For me, personally, I wouldn’t do it. Instead of getting “tattoos”…Fiance and I came up with something different… we are having our initials and wedding date engraved inside our wedding bands, plus because he plays hockey as a goalie quite frequently- he had a painter put my initials on his mask with our anniversary date. (That made my heart melt)
Post # 9
SO and I are fairly heavily tattooed, and like Mrs.Charpentier, we agreed not to get each other’s names/initials. Our best friends (who have been happily married for years and have child #2 on the way) have each other’s names tattooed, and I think it’s perfect… for them.
I guess it’s just personal preference. SO and I got matching rose tattoos that hold meaning for us… I think that’s much more special than a name/initials, because then it’s something just between YOU TWO.
Either way, do what YOU want, I just hope this helped give a little insight. 🙂
Post # 10
I personally wouldn’t do it.
Post # 11
I used to be one of the ones that said they would never do it, but now that I’ve met the right guy, I could see me getting his first initial, not his whole name though, just in case something DID ever happen. If it’s right for you, go for it.
Post # 12
- Wedding: September 2011 - Bent Creek Winery (Livermore, California); Reception: Family Residence (San Ramon, California)
I think it’s entirely up to you. Personally, it’s not my style, and thinking as the gift receiver, I wouldn’t be too excited about this.
Post # 13
Nope. Child or deceased person’s name MAYBE, but not a spouse.
Post # 14
I surely wouldn’t, but it’s your skin.
Post # 15
I would never get someone’s name, initial, picture, etc tattood on me. I have a tattoo and having nothing against them, but never think those are good ideas. Except maybe a child’s name. My dad had the name “Wanda” on his arm. I still don’t know who “Wanda” was.
Post # 16
My vote is NO…but if this is you and your SO’s style, then go for it! It’s just so…permanent! Haha but this is coming from someone who is far too indecisive to ever commit to a tattoo.