Show me your 0.6 ct rings on petite fingers (size 3 -4) pretty please!

posted 1 week ago in Rings
Post # 2
Member
15 posts
Newbee

Mine is .70 center but I’m size 4 so it will almost the same coverage of the finger.  Would love to see ur ring when u got it:)

Post # 3
Member
388 posts
Helper bee

Mine is 0.76 carat, size 4.5 finger.

Post # 4
Member
1024 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: August 2018

0.60ct center but size 4.75/5 finger. I’m sure yours will be beautiful!! This is such a good size for smaller fingers ☺️

Post # 5
Member
18 posts
Newbee
  • Wedding: July 2019

Your rings all look so much bigger than my 0.91 carat. I have a size 4.5 finger. 

 

Post # 6
Member
860 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: October 2015

Carat size is a good reference but mm diameter of the stone(s) you are considering is more important. As the bee above said hers is a .91 and the others are in the .70s and they look the sameish size. A higher carat weight diamond with small dimensions is most likely cut too deep which yields a higher carat weight, thus increasing the the price for something that you can’t see. 

Post # 7
Member
18 posts
Newbee
  • Wedding: July 2019

KKJohnson :  thanks for your reply. I never knew that about the stone proportions. I just looked at my GIA paperwork and the dimensions of my ring are 6.15 -6.17 x 3.87. Cut very good. VS2. I wonder if that is considered deep??

Post # 8
Member
24 posts
Newbee
  • Wedding: August 2018

That’s definitely not too deep for a .6 carat! In fact, I believe that that’s a larger face-up proportion than most that size: https://www.gemsociety.org/article/standard-gem-sizes-chart/

I’m a size 4 and just upgraded my stone to a .63 (was a .47 and wanted slightly bigger with much better cut/clarity). I’m waiting another week for it (hand feels so bare without my wedding rings!)…but I’ll post when I get it 🙂

Post # 9
Member
1024 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: August 2018

sscarpellini :  Your stone isn’t particularly deep, but it definitely isn’t the “average” size for a .91ct. The average is closer to 6.3mm, but yours looks like it still sparkles beautifully!

Post # 10
Member
860 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: October 2015

sscarpellini :  those are just the size measurements, you need to look at the proportions 

 

Post # 11
Member
18 posts
Newbee
  • Wedding: July 2019

KKJohnson :   I’ve researched this a little and discovered that my depth percentage is 62.8% which I guess is on the high side for a 0.9 carat. This would explain why my ring looks smaller. I wish I had found this website before we picked out my ring. We figured since it came with a GIA certificate it must have been good. 

Post # 12
Member
877 posts
Busy bee

Here’s my .62 round brilliant solitaire on a 3.5 finger!

Post # 13
Member
24 posts
Newbee
  • Wedding: August 2018

Shamelessly bumping this thread because I’m in the exact same boat (size 4 waiting on a .63ct)!

Post # 14
Member
24 posts
Newbee
  • Wedding: August 2018

Actually, my jeweler just called after my last post and I picked up my ring! Here’s a .63ct, I color, VS2, triple x on a size 4 finger! We just upgraded to .63ct (and better specs) from .47ct for my first anniversary. The setting is from my husband’s great-grandmother 🙂

Post # 15
Member
24 posts
Newbee
  • Wedding: August 2018

Here’s a better angle!

Leave a comment


Find Amazing Vendors