(Closed) Silk Pocket Squares: Are they necessary

posted 7 years ago in Grooms/men
  • poll: Are silk pocket squares worth the hype?
    Have the groomsmen wear the tuxedo collection and rock a boutonnière only : (11 votes)
    28 %
    The silk pocket square is the must have accessory for 2012! : (12 votes)
    31 %
    Pocket squares can be tossed in the river : (16 votes)
    41 %
  • Post # 3
    Member
    2142 posts
    Buzzing bee
    • Wedding: August 2010

    I think pocket squares are so 1990. Just my opinion.

    Post # 4
    Member
    6248 posts
    Bee Keeper
    • Wedding: August 1900

    I like the way they look but no way do I think they are required or necessary.

    Post # 5
    Member
    1561 posts
    Bumble bee
    • Wedding: November 1999

    I don’t think they are necessary.

    Post # 6
    Member
    1542 posts
    Bumble bee
    • Wedding: December 2012

    I don’t think they’re necesary and I think having a pocket square and a buutonniere might be too much (I might be wrong) though.

    By The Way: I loved the poll options =P

    Post # 7
    Member
    5494 posts
    Bee Keeper
    • Wedding: August 2011

    @MapleMoose: yes I agree.  I like them because I think they just complete the look.  But no they are not necessary.

    Our guys had a pockets square and a boutennier and I think it looked very classic.

    Recaps 4 - Bridal Party Photos :  wedding EddieAlla0705

    Post # 8
    Member
    2714 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: May 2012

    Hahaha your poll options cracked me up.

    I’m not a fan of the pocket squares at all. The only reason I see for the pocket squares is if the guys aren’t wearing bouts.

    Post # 9
    Member
    3618 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: November 2011

    I don’t think pocket squares are necessary, but we opted to get them for our gm. I liked the added color.

    Post # 10
    Member
    4519 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: September 2010

    Yeah, I agree with regberadaisy that they seem kind of dated to me. Totally not necessary, IMO.

    Post # 11
    Member
    3482 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: February 2011

    Nope, sorry, you can’t get get married unless all the guys are wearing pocket squares. It’s in the legal section of the ceremony. “I ______ do solemnly declare that I know of no lawful impediment or absence of pocket square determining that I may not marry ______.” 😉

    Aesthetically I prefer having just one or the other, although it does depend on the pocket square. My dad wore a boutonniere and pocket square at my wedding, and because the square was muted greens and blues instead of stark white or a bright colour, it didn’t look too busy at all. But in general I prefer boutonnieres on their own.

    Post # 12
    Member
    389 posts
    Helper bee
    • Wedding: September 2012

    I don’t really like the look of pocket squares.. I think they look kind of tacky, but that might just be because they remind me of prom night 😀

    Post # 14
    Hostess
    23599 posts
    Honey Beekeeper
    • Wedding: September 2011

    I like them, but they’re certainly not necessary. I let Darling Husband and his brother (best man) decide what to do.  They bought the pocket squares the day before the wedding, after having second thoughts about not doing them. 😛 This picture might help you decide, since one of the groomsmen below’s pocket square wouldn’t stay sticking out of his pocket. Compare his look to everyone else’s! 😛

    Post # 15
    Member
    1991 posts
    Buzzing bee
    • Wedding: October 2011

    Pocket squares certainly aren’t necessary.

    With that being said, my husband was adamant about not having any boutineers therefore, him and the groomsmen used the handkerchiefs that came with their ties.

     

    Post # 16
    Member
    7394 posts
    Busy Beekeeper

    @pengoala: Wow I love the color combo!

    And no pocket squares aren’t necessary.

    The topic ‘Silk Pocket Squares: Are they necessary’ is closed to new replies.

    Find Amazing Vendors