(Closed) Size vs. Quality…we’re talking rings here ya pervs :P

posted 9 years ago in Rings
Post # 17
Member
2192 posts
Buzzing bee
  • Wedding: May 2012

I have no desire to see the appraisal of my ring.  All I know is that he did a great job and got a beautiful stone.  Emerald cut, very good cut, about a carat or just over.  I think.  haha.  All I know is some of my friends bigger stones look yellow next to mine. 🙂  Quality.

Post # 18
Member
122 posts
Blushing bee
  • Wedding: May 2011

i am SO glad that majority of the people said quality as i also believe that this is more important. my ring gets noticed from across the room and strangers comment and stare at it. i even have a friend who has a 1.5 kwt always comment on how beutiful it is. its a 1.01 VVS2 F very good cut. but looks bigger bc of the quality. i am looking to upgrade it to perhaps a 1.3 but that’ll be when we saved enough and i can work with it as im in healthcare and dont want to be harming my patients with it.

Post # 19
Member
122 posts
Blushing bee
  • Wedding: May 2011

@MrsMaine:definitely like your second ring more…and it looks much bigger even though i know your first one was bigger.

Post # 20
Member
14976 posts
Honey Beekeeper
  • Wedding: June 2011

@agirlwithdreams7: Absolutely, we all want the best looking.  But everyones definition of best looking and overkill is different.

Post # 21
Member
2906 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: July 2011

@agirlwithdreams7:Can I just say something that bugs me.

 

Isn’t size a quality? It’s not the only quality, but it is one.

 

Ok, I’ll shut up now.

Post # 22
Member
222 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: May 2011

i agree with @pinkshoes:, everyone has their own preferences and definition of quality and what is too big or not. depends on that.

Post # 23
Member
4802 posts
Honey bee
  • Wedding: August 2012

Well, I might be the only dissenting voice here but…

I went for size over “quality”.  My stone is just over one carat and I guess by most of your standards it would seem to be low quality since it does have a visible inclusion.  Yes, when I look really really closely I can see a black dot/slight black line at some angles, but when I don’t look really closely (and I doubt anyone else does), I don’t notice it.  It’s still nearly colourless and sparkly with a good cut.  I don’t know…I just couldn’t justify the price jump up for more “quality” and this size was the look I wanted.

 

Post # 24
Member
73 posts
Worker bee
  • Wedding: July 2006

I’d prefer something with excellent cut, G/H color, VS2 or above.  I would not pay extra for a D/E, IF stone, because I can’t really tell the difference.

Post # 25
Member
1041 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: November 2012

I would go with quality over size for sure.

Post # 26
Member
674 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: October 2011

Huge diamonds don’t do it for me. I’d pick quality any day (and did). I don’t particularly mind clarity, as long as it’s eye-clean (though some people have eagle-eye vision and can see inclusions you and I might not be able to see), but I do like icy-white stones, so I definitely wouldn’t go too low in colour. And definitely a great cut. Having said this, I’d go for a diamond over any other stone.

Post # 27
Member
2299 posts
Buzzing bee
  • Wedding: June 2010

At first I was going to say the bigger stone, but after seeing comparison stones I would much rather have the higher quality stone!

Post # 28
Member
11324 posts
Sugar Beekeeper
  • Wedding: February 2011

It is situation-specific for me… like I have a different answer if we’re talking about .5 v. 1 ct or 1 v. 2 ct. 

If we were in a position that my choices were a .5 very good quality stone v. 1 ct lower quality stone, I’d probably pick the 1 ct. I don’t need a huge rock, but for me personally, I kind of wanted something around 1ct and I think I would have sacrificed quality to get it. 

In our situation though, we were choosing between a 1ct excellent quality stone v. 2 ct low quality stone. I’m glad my husband went with the 1ct. I think the size looks good on me and I don’t need anything bigger, so I’m glad he went for the best quality and uber sparkle. 

Post # 29
Member
995 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: September 2009

I would prefer the bigger stone if the diamond was eyeclean, the color I prefer and a great cut. And I would prefer a diamond over a simulant.

On a side note: Just because someone has a “large” diamond doesn’t mean its low quality. I hope that doesn’t sound snarky-and it isn’t directed at anyone-and I know that wasn’t what this post was about. It just bugs me when some people say “My diamond is small but its AMAZING quality and it sparkles like CRAZY! I wanted a beautiful diamond over a big crappy one.” Kinda implying that bigger stones must be lesser quality. I have seen several gorgeous “large” diamonds and many not so nice “small” diamonds.

Post # 30
Member
5572 posts
Bee Keeper
  • Wedding: June 2011

@MrsMaine:Wow!! Your second ring is stunning! You can definitely see the difference.

 

I prefer a smaller diamond with better color, etc. I think it depends on the person though. I don’t think there’s one “right” answer, just personal preference.

Post # 31
Member
9816 posts
Buzzing Beekeeper

@kelmac: Generally people just mean what they could afford in their budget. Obviously there are some amazing 2-6ct diamonds out there of awesome cut and clarity, but for most people that is not realistic. It’s about prioritizing where that money is going.

The topic ‘Size vs. Quality…we’re talking rings here ya pervs :P’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors