Post # 1
HELP! I’ve narrowed my choices down to these two rings and I can’t decide. I need to see ENG010 IRL! I came across ENG178a so I know what that looks like! My inital concerns with ENG010 was that it was the same ring that a bee here had trouble with but the folks at Mo&CO said it’s not the same ring because this model has prong set stones instead of pave but I still need to see one! Does anyone have this ring? If so can you PLEASE post pics of it!! I really don’t know which to get! HELP ME BEES
This is ENG178a
And this is ENG010
This topic was modified 2 years, 11 months ago by MissBreezy13.
Post # 2
MissBreezy13: I wish I had a pic for you, but I just wanted to say I absolutely love love love the first ring you posted. It’s somewhat classic, but with a twist. I think it’s stunning. Both are beautiful, but there’s something about that first one that draws me in.
Post # 3
MissBreezy13: I don’t have any pics, but I LOVE the 1st ring.
Post # 4
Both are very nice. I love halos (that is what mine is), but I thought the double halo was almost too much when looking at from above.
Have you tried both of them on? I know the ring I had my eye on forever online did not look good on my finger, so I opted for the one I have – which is very similiar to the one I had loved for so long.
Post # 5
It’s all about your taste, but I personally find the double halo on #2 to be a bit much, and I usually like more intricate settings. I think #1 is very pretty and a classic.
Post # 6
I like the eng178a much better than the double halo.
Post # 8
I prefer the first ring, but I definitely fall in the less is more camp!
Post # 9
I much prefer the ENG178a.
The second one would also be tough to fit with a wedding band.
Post # 10
The first ring is the one I purchased for my brother to propose to my SIL with, and it is gorgeous! The halo is quite subtle and she absolutely adores it, it is perfect for her!
I don’t think you can go wrong either way, as double halos are so uniquely pretty too! Have you gone on Pinterest and searched for “double halo” rings? You might not find that *exact* ring, but you’ll see lots of rings on fingers much like it!
If you do go with the second ring however, I’d recommend a smaller center stone than if you went with the first. 😉
Post # 11
The first ring is on my list for so but I fear it sits too high and will be in my way… but it’s gorgeous!
Post # 12
ENG178a, and it’s not close.
Post # 13
- Wedding: September 2012 - Southern California
That first ring is gorgeous & no competition with the second!
Post # 14
The second I saw ENG178a I fell in love and didn’t look back, I had to have it!! Well, that was about a year ago (around the time you wrote this post) and I can finally say I HAVE IT!!! Oh my goodness it’s overwhelmingly exciting! Here are a couple pics (don’t mind my nails, I’m desperately in need of a manicure haha!)
2.5 ct forever brilliant moissanite size 7 finger
Post # 15
I adore the 1st one. Delicate with gorgeous details. The second one looks too chunky for my taste