(Closed) The Kardashian dresses

posted 9 years ago in Dress
Post # 92
Member
1679 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: June 2012

I’m so ignorant about this girl. I know there is a reality show about them. Why did they get the show? Just being Bruce Jenner’s kids got them a show? Does anyone under 30 even remember Bruce Jenner?

Post # 93
Member
3367 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: March 2011

View original reply
@dynamic_duo:  I don’t think they actually spent that much on the diamonds… I believe they were on loan…

Post # 94
Member
1679 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: June 2012

I bet A LOT of goods and services were given for free or a reduced rate in exchange for publicity.

Post # 95
Member
431 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: September 2011

Honestly,  I liked her sisters wedding dress and the whole wedding much better than this. This is just a complete mess.., not elegant at all and way over the top , its kinda ugly..sorry but it is.

 

It looks dated even tho it just happened few days ago, sadly but its true. It looks like a wedding from years ago. The dress is just too much and its white?? Who does white now , I think it would’ve looked better if it was offwhite or something. Also the style of the dress just did not go with her at all. Her ring is ugly..big yet does not sparkle at all, unlike khloe , her ring is gorgeous and yet cheaper.

Kims hair in some pics look like oily and she had tons of gel or something to make it stick in taht ugly hair style…ugh, she is a very pretty girl and I like her out of the other sisters because she is more down to earth but what in the world is wrong with her fashion sense.

Also all these posts about how much her wedding more than the princess wedding yet it did nothing for me at all. I dont see where the money was spent on ?

 

Post # 96
Member
7294 posts
Busy Beekeeper

View original reply
@jjmomma: ah ok. my mouth was dropping to the floor at the prices!

 

i think i know why everyone is so underwhelmed by her wedding pics. besides the obvious i mean. but its not just about what we are seeing, its about what we are NOT seeing!  On here, we always ooh and aah over the details – that’s what we all do to make our weddings unique or incorporate our personalities.  Kim’s pics are just celebrity shots and a bunch of white dresses. the only “details” we see are her phallic cake and oversized diamonds!  i don’t know much about her, never seen the show….but maybe that is her way of incorporating her personality?

 

ETA: my bad! i just noticed there IS a page about details….i must have skipped over it because they were all lumped together.

Post # 97
Member
9816 posts
Buzzing Beekeeper

She always is dressed to the nines and in full hair and makeup, so I guess it’s hard to get that “Wow!” factor now that she’s a bride?

Normally when I see people on their wedding it’s a rare occasion to see them glammed up, but she always looks like that, minus the headdress. Her makeup looks exactly the same as it always does.

Post # 99
Member
95 posts
Worker bee
  • Wedding: September 2011

With all the talks about it for so long, I was expecting it to be a little more out there, it wasn’t and it looks kind of odd that others are wearing white on her day… the dresses, I seen better dresses on the women here

Post # 100
Member
1271 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: December 2013

View original reply
@emersynsmommy35:  my thoughts exactly.

View original reply
@Jeannine @ Small Chic:  you’re probably right, and that’s even MORE disgusting, IMO, because she can afford this stuff without discounts or freebies.  the only thing worse than a shameless display of wealth is a shameless display of wealth that you didn’t actually have to pay for, when you really should have.

Post # 101
Member
310 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: May 2011

For being in the spot light so much, I would have thought there’d be some trend setting! What happened? 

Was Gwen the only one with some style in the celebrity realm as far as weddings are concerned?! 

I actually liked the near like Bride dresses her maids wore (the lore behind it all was beautiful to me) They actually looked better than the Bride, Sad because she has some curves!! {p.s. I think I read they were “Ivory” dresses, if that matters any} 

Headpiece …I am with the camp that said “eww” At least not with a veil like that! THAT was gorgeous…

The Cake was pretty neat though! Oh and that exquisite table.. 

 

Post # 103
Hostess
11163 posts
Sugar Beekeeper

View original reply
@jjmomma: Agreed, it is all part of the publicity. They loan the diamonds because they know she will be photographed and in the end their business will boom. I always joke that those that can afford luxuries don’t have to pay for them and those that cannot afford it get charged.

Again, this wedding seems to be all about good business deals….not about a marriage (IMHO).

Post # 104
Member
5282 posts
Bee Keeper
  • Wedding: October 2009

LOL! I knew she was getting married sometime – but I didn’t even know she already had!

Wish I could consistenly get eyelash extensions like hers 🙁

Post # 105
Member
3367 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: March 2011

Just to add to the white bridesmaids debate… I read somewhere that in Victorian times, it was tradition that the entire bridal party wore white and the bride’s headpiece (usually a lace cap) was the only thing that set her apart from the others… which sounds a lot like Kim’s weddiing.  I just think it was a weird mash-up of some good ideas. 

Post # 106
Member
316 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: October 2012

I’m really not too impressed with anything I’ve seen. But the venue looks nice!

The topic ‘The Kardashian dresses’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors