(Closed) Thinner or thicker bands?

posted 4 years ago in Rings
  • poll: Thinner or thicker bands?

    Thinner bands (both 2mm)

    Thicker bands (both 2.5mm)

  • Post # 2
    932 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: May 2017

    2 and 2.5 is not a huge difference but do you plan on wearing the wedding band on its own at times? If you do, the 2.5 would stand out a bit better on its own and overall the 2.5 set doesn’t look too bulky on your hand. 


    Post # 3
    3313 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: City, State

    View original reply
    rrrr :  2.5 gets my vote. Just think it makes the set look more balanced and substantial 

    Post # 4
    2652 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: May 2017

    Lol. The irony of the perfectly even 50% vote when trying toget help making s decision. Ugh.

    I voted for 2.5mm

    Post # 5
    1697 posts
    Bumble bee
    • Wedding: May 2016

    2.5 looks nicely proportioned to your hand.

    Post # 8
    17 posts

    I vote for 2.5 mm , as for me it looks more substantial.

    Post # 9
    82 posts
    Worker bee

    I personally like thinner bands–it makes the fingers look longer and your center stone pop! 2mm has my vote!

    Post # 10
    387 posts
    Helper bee

    I voted 2mm. I love thinner bands. 

    Post # 12
    538 posts
    Busy bee

    I think 2.5 is the perfect “happy place” for band widths. I know thin is in… But i also picture being able to just snip those rings with a wire cutter haha. I don’t know, something with a little more substance has more of a quality look and feel to me. Its all personal preference 🙂

    The topic ‘Thinner or thicker bands?’ is closed to new replies.

    Find Amazing Vendors