Post # 1
I would like an actual wedding band for the day of the wedding and have discussed this with my fiancee. He says he’s cool either way but thinks because of the Ering I have it would be too much even with a small one. What are your thoughts? Do you just wear your Ering or do you have both?
Post # 2
A slim diamond bnd would look very nice xx
Post # 3
I don’t think it would be too much at all, you have lots of space left on your finger for additional rings. And your engagement ring is beautiful, I like how the band is the same width as the stone. My engagement ring is a split shank thats about 6mm across the setting, which is the widest point, and I have 2 bands now, because I gotta second one for Christmas, for a total of 4.5mm on bands and my fingers are short and it’s fine, I don’t think it looks like too much at all. My bands are both all met though, I do find it a bit much when people wear multiple rings that all have stones, but that’s personal taste.
Post # 4
I think a thin rounded band would be beautiful! Or a very tiny band with pave diamonds. Plus if you are traveling or working with your hands than you can just wear that so it’s not in the way or gets lost.
Post # 5
You will be fine with a wedding band. It won’t be too much. I personally would find it odd to not have a wedding band with your ring after you get married. A wedding band completes the look.
Post # 6
could I please m and thank you.
Post # 7
- Wedding: February 2019 - City, State
I don’t see why you shouldn’t have a band! I think something with a different texture would look really nice, like a twisted or diamond band that’s on the thinner side.
Post # 9
A thin wedding band would look great. You could do a thin pave band or cconsider mixing metals and getting a plain rose or yellow gold band.