(Closed) Thoughts on full on reception vs. dinner?

posted 3 years ago in Etiquette
Post # 2
Member
12621 posts
Honey Beekeeper
  • Wedding: November 1999

What do you want to do?  I think either option sounds fine, and the deciding factor should really be what you and your fiance want to do.  I think if you sat your neices and nephews together (and provided activities if they’re younger), they’d have a good time hanging out and talking to each other, regardless of dancing or not. 

You may also even be able to get a larger reserved space in a restaurant where you could have some dancing, with an ipod playing music.

Post # 3
Member
2853 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: May 2014

I am about your age.  We are just doing dinner for 40 after the wedding.  No dancing here.  I would rather attend a wedding that is just a nice dinner!

Post # 4
Member
1773 posts
Buzzing bee
  • Wedding: July 2014

Prettysmile40: it’s not as though dinner only would be just as long as a full reception. your guests have all gone to a dinner, so I don’t see why they’d be bored for a 2-3 hour dinner? whatever you and your FI prefer seems fine. Either the typical 4-6 hour reception or a 2-3 hour dinner. what negative things would your nieces and nephews think?

Post # 7
Member
2665 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: April 2014 - Italian Villa

Prettysmile40:  I am 23 and got married two weeks ago.  We just did dinner and used an iPod for a couple songs. Nobody was bored.  (We had 21 guests)

The topic ‘Thoughts on full on reception vs. dinner?’ is closed to new replies.

Get our weekly roundup of the best of Weddingbee.
I agree to receive emails from the site. I can withdraw my consent at any time by unsubscribing.

Find Amazing Vendors