(Closed) Thoughts on second shooter for photography?

posted 11 years ago in Photos/Videos
Post # 32
4566 posts
Honey bee
  • Wedding: August 2010

I think a second shooter is so, so important! We’ll definintely have one. I love posed AND unposed pictures of us and our guests, so I want all the bases covered!

Post # 33
3 posts

Here is what I recommend to my clients.

Always have a 2nd photographer if you can afford it. It is well worth it.

Please keep in mind that ONE photogrpaher can only be at ONE place at any given time and onoly shoot from ONE driection and with ONE type of lens. If you want a larger variety of angels, lens types (close up vs. wide angle), and more moments of your special day saved you should make sure your have a 2nd photogrpaher.

I normally recommend having a 2nd photographer for any wedding above 60 people. It’s a must for any wedding above 120 people.

The topic ‘Thoughts on second shooter for photography?’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors