(Closed) Time for Pictures?

posted 8 years ago in Photos/Videos
Post # 3
291 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: October 2012

I believe 3 hours sounds about right – hot long is the ceremony?

Post # 4
3041 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: May 2010

I would say 3 hours is plenty of time, I’m assuming a 30 minute ceremony? And, photo shoot will be on location of the wedding?

Is the reception just with those at the wedding, or are you having a bigger reception?

Post # 5
624 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: May 2011

Ms Smitten, when I was looking for a Photographer I had the same Dillema.

I am also having a avery small Wedding.

I was lucky enough to find a Photographer that made me a package ala cart.

We agreed on 4 hours total.

She’s only taking pics of the ceremony, some portraits and a little bit of the Reception lunch before we sit down and eat, she says people dont like being photographed eating, so it works out great.

So it IS doable, no worries hun.


Post # 6
610 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: May 2011

I think 3 hours sounds right. We are doing some photos before the wedding and the photographer said 2 to 4 hours depending on how many different poses and locations we plan on using.

The topic ‘Time for Pictures?’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors