(Closed) Too small for my finger? .50ct

posted 7 years ago in Rings
Post # 2
2935 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: July 2015

View original reply
jae.nicole27:  I think it is beautiful! It looks liike a good size, and you’ll have so many options for wedding bands!

Post # 3
358 posts
Helper bee

Agreed with PP 🙂

Post # 5
128 posts
Blushing bee
  • Wedding: March 2015

It’s perfect! Classic and lovely!

Post # 6
477 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: July 2020

Agree with PP, classic elegant ring 🙂

Post # 7
474 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: July 2015

Its gorgeous. I’m a quality over quantity girl, so I appreciate the true and timeless beauty your ring has. Sparkle was very important to me, as was clarity. Like you, I could’ve gotten a bigger rock for what Fiance paid, but we opted for a smaller stone bc you can’t beat quality.

Truth be told, my MoH has a 1/2c, a lot smaller than mine, and it catches my eye ALL THE TIME. 

Post # 8
631 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: October 2014

it is perfect!

Post # 9
1559 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: June 2015

It looks great! Definitely enough coverage. 

Post # 11
25 posts
  • Wedding: Ancaster Mill

I think it’s beautiful. I prefer smaller rings. And don’t forget, a bigger stone but lower quality won’t be as nice. I have a small one myself, 0.33ct to be exact and it’s perfect for me. The biggest one I looked at was .5ct but the quality wasn’t anywhere near the same.

Post # 12
319 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: June 2015

Beautiful but yeah I think it looks pretty small on your hand. You could get a blingy wedding band or enhancers to make it pop!

Post # 13
51 posts
Worker bee

your ring is so grogeous as is… but if you are looking for more finger coverage, consider an enhancer as a wedding band!! I definitely dont think its too small. I have a 0.5 carrat and love it!

these are picture exmaples i found on google. Theres so much ou can do!

Post # 14
6522 posts
Bee Keeper

View original reply
jae.nicole27:  Definitely not too small for your hand. It looks beautiful, beautiful, beautiful on your finger. I think .50 is a great size. The center stone in my original engagement ring was around that size, although it wasn’t a solitaire. I agree with PPs, too, that you have tons of options for wedding bands. It’s a very pretty stone and ring!

Post # 15
3345 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: August 2012

I agree with the quality versus quanity.  You can really do a lot with bands to make it pop.  Here is my .5 ring. It’s not really a solitare, but you could definately do something smilar and get a similar effect.   I found some enhancers?  that matched perfectly with it.  If the stone was any larger I think that the enhancers would have been too much.  

The topic ‘Too small for my finger? .50ct’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors