(Closed) Torn between two Moissys: Help me decide!

posted 6 years ago in Rings
  • poll: Which set would you prefer?
    #1 : (132 votes)
    69 %
    #2 : (56 votes)
    29 %
    Other (explain) : (3 votes)
    2 %
  • Post # 3
    Member
    2638 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: November 2006

    I don’t like halos so this was an easy vote for me!

    Post # 4
    Member
    913 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: April 2014

    I voted #1 because it looks more like a classic wedding set to me. The second ring looks more like a right-hand ring and the band doesn’t really work with it IMO.

    Post # 6
    Member
    331 posts
    Helper bee
    • Wedding: February 2015

    I like the second one but I do think you should find another band for it. Both are beautiful and stunning! ๐Ÿ™‚

    Post # 7
    Member
    4478 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: November 2012

    Since you said you like antique styles I voted for #2.  I actually like that the band is so simple; it’s a nice contrast with the ornate ering.

    Post # 9
    Member
    1243 posts
    Bumble bee
    • Wedding: December 2010

    Both rings are beautiful.

    To complicate things- I really love the second ring because I think that it’s unique, but agree with you; I don’t like the matching band.  I wouldn’t want to wear the band by itself (is that something you might do?) and I also don’t think that the plain band looks..right with all the antique openwork, etc on the engagement ring; it’s too plain.

    The first ring is really really gorge.  You could wear the wedding band by itself if you ever wanted to (there’s a new baby in my life and I almost scratched her with my engagement ring and I’ve stopped wearing my engagement ring for some deep cleaning tasks because I keep knocking it).  

    Both rings are “classic” IMO, but the first screams ENGAGEMENT RING!  ๐Ÿ™‚

    If I could vote, I would probably say 2nd ring with a different band, but as  is…I guess I’d go with the first one.

    Holy crap that was a long post- sorry.

    Post # 10
    Member
    580 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: May 2014

    Number 2, Number 2, Number 2!!! <3

    Post # 11
    Member
    1243 posts
    Bumble bee
    • Wedding: December 2010

    @MissCalifornia:   I’d definitely rock the gap.

    http://www.brilliantearth.com/Hand-Engraved-Laurel-Ring-White-Gold-BE243B/

    The above kind of replicates the swirls in the antique ring.

    http://www.brilliantearth.com/Tiara-Eternity-Diamond-Ring-White-Gold-BE250BDE/

    This one kind of copies the pear-shaped side areas of the antique ring.

    http://www.brilliantearth.com/Jardini%C3%A8re-Wedding-Ring-White-Gold-BE2C8817C/

    More swirls and milgrain detail.

     

    Post # 13
    Member
    11272 posts
    Sugar Beekeeper
    • Wedding: April 2012

    wow, they are both very different. i was expecting something a bit more similar.  which one would match your everyday style more?  which one do you see yourself wearing in 10, 20, 30+ years?  can you wearing the matching band by itself ?

    personally, i love the first one.  i love cushion cut and i really like the halo thing.  i have just never been into the scrolling, antique look myself.

    both very beautiful.  can’t go wrong with either.

    Post # 14
    Member
    1150 posts
    Bumble bee
    • Wedding: September 2013 - Ontario, Canada

    I would go for the secord one. As much as I like halo’s I just think that one is much more original and you are unlikely to meet someone with the same ring as yours. That’s why I have voted for that though both are lovely!

    Post # 16
    Member
    1243 posts
    Bumble bee
    • Wedding: December 2010

    @MissCalifornia:  Yay!  ๐Ÿ™‚  I’m glad to have helped.

    The one you picked from the 3 I posted is also my favourite.

    The topic ‘Torn between two Moissys: Help me decide!’ is closed to new replies.

    Find Amazing Vendors