(Closed) Totally disappointed

posted 7 years ago in Dress
Post # 3
Member
2246 posts
Buzzing bee
  • Wedding: May 2011

@tropicalcara:

Wow you sound so angry. Its just a wedding.

Post # 4
Member
1645 posts
Bumble bee

This is your first post? Uh….welcome…?

Post # 5
Member
1314 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: January 2016

uhhh…did you make an account just to post this? lol.

Post # 6
Member
283 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: July 2011

I thought Kate looked absolutely beautiful, and William was in handsome traditional garb.

“Glitz” is not a synonym for beautiful.

Post # 7
Member
2577 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: June 2010

Sheesh.

You call a vintage Cartier tiara “made for a little girl”?

Glitz is for pageants, not for a royal.

Lol- thanks for the giggle though : )

Post # 8
Member
10367 posts
Sugar Beekeeper
  • Wedding: September 2010

I thought it was endearing that Kate held fast to her identity and tastes in choosing her bridal attire.

Post # 9
Member
1645 posts
Bumble bee

You know guys, if this is a troll they aren’t very original. There have already been dozens of threads dedicated to the tearing down of the newest royal.

ETA: See my rant here.

Post # 11
Member
2246 posts
Buzzing bee
  • Wedding: May 2011

She looks amazing!!!!

Post # 12
Member
3482 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: February 2011

The new troll was obvious and unoriginal. Her prose was uninspired and she sounded more childish than the tiara she loathed so vehemently.

Post # 13
Member
232 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: June 2011

haha this is funny….what did you expect diamonds for confetti?

 

The only part I agree with is the bouquet….otherwise everything was glamorous, sophisticated and beautiful

Post # 14
Member
318 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: February 2011

When did WB become a site for trolling? Bleh.

Post # 15
Member
182 posts
Blushing bee
  • Wedding: May 2010

Hmmm. It was a wedding not prom… I liked it. I loved the tiara and I loved that is was her something borrowed. I didn’t really like the bouquet either though. The detailign on the dress is only visable in some pictures, but when you can really see the details on the hem of the shirt it is really gourgeous.

Post # 16
Member
318 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: February 2011

@alaiyo:I loved her bouquet! Classic and beautiful, and very symbolic. Also, I love that part of it was used from stems from a myrtle planted by Queen Victoria. I think that it was simple and special, much better than just buying some big, trendy bouquet that would take attention away from her.

The topic ‘Totally disappointed’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors