(Closed) Ugly or awesome?

posted 8 years ago in Rings
  • poll: Pretty or ugly?

    I think it's super pretty because it's so unique

    I think it's super ugly because the band looks like rings around Saturn

    I wouldn't wear it but I think it's pretty for someone else's hand

  • Post # 32
    Member
    2776 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: July 2013

    1.5-2 carats is a sizable center stone, when you add a lot of detail around it in the wrong way it actually draws the attention away, I wouldn’t want to wear that but perphaps for an older person as PP’s have said its okay.

    Post # 33
    Member
    1463 posts
    Bumble bee
    • Wedding: February 2011

    Love it!  One of the flash NZ jewellers (Partridge Jeweller’s) does some similar rings which I’m totally in love with.

    Post # 34
    Member
    886 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: November 1999

    Well, it’s definitely not traditional or trendy… though I have been seeing more and more of that style of ring lately to be honest. I’d never wear it myself. Way too much sparkle even for me. And I am already picturing all the stones falling out one by one with my clumsiness. It also seems like it’d get snagged on things easily, which would drive me crazy. But if someone else likes it, more power to them!

    Post # 35
    Member
    554 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: June 2014

    It’s a bit bling for me (I’m a tomboy with potato farmer hands!) but I loved the style – because of the similarity to Saturn’s rings/atoms etc. I think it’s funky.

    Post # 36
    Member
    2491 posts
    Buzzing bee
    • Wedding: July 2012

    I love it! I also think it’s trendy, and as a result, wouldn’t want it as an e-ring. I would DEF wear it as a RHR anytime.

    Post # 37
    Member
    4108 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: December 2011

    I think it’s really pretty.

    Post # 38
    Member
    4354 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: June 2013

    I looked at this yesterday, came back today and I’m still not sure about this. It’s not UGLY, because in principle the bands are nice and so is the main stone however I think the bands are too far apart that that’s what is tricking my eye. Would be phenomenal if they were closer together though.

    Post # 39
    Member
    1736 posts
    Bumble bee

    I think it’s pretty – but I would question whether or not said person wants to be able to wear a wedding band as that ring wouldn’t allow for it.

    Post # 40
    Member
    187 posts
    Blushing bee
    • Wedding: May 2012

    I love it. It isn’t traditional or trendy at all. I wish I could wear something like that but wouldn’t because I have short chubby fingers. It would look great on someone with long thin fingers.

    Post # 41
    Member
    2353 posts
    Buzzing bee

    It’s interesting. Too blingy for my own plain hand 🙂 but quite pretty.

    Post # 42
    Member
    5373 posts
    Bee Keeper
    • Wedding: June 2014

    View original reply
    @EffieTrinket:  Omg that’s exactly what it reminded me of too! 😉

    I like it, but I don’t think I could pull it off.

    Post # 43
    Member
    4943 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: July 2012

    I actually quite like it.

    Post # 44
    Member
    684 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: February 2010

    Wow, I would just wear that as a wedding “set”, so awesome! (My inner geek definitely loves it too)

    Post # 45
    Member
    4474 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: November 2012

    I think it’s pretty cool, in an atomic, astronomic sort of way.  I think you’d have to have long-fingered hands to pull it off, though.  It would overwhelm short fingers.

    Post # 46
    Member
    802 posts
    Busy bee

    I think it’s definitely appropriate for someone of an older age, and I think only someone of her age would be able to pull off a ring like that.

    The topic ‘Ugly or awesome?’ is closed to new replies.

    Find Amazing Vendors