Post # 92
+1 I also don’t see a problem with this
Post # 93
Going off the original topic and criticizing pp opinions by labeling them “judgmental” and then telling them they
are “threadjacking” when they respond
to your judgments
is hypocritcal and threadjacking….
Look in your own mirror….
Don’t dish it if you can’t take it.
Post # 94
I guess I would feel uncomfortable since your FI’s parents are basically increasing his loan amount from $5k to $10k+. I think the issue I would have is once you’re married, his debt becomes your debt in a way and I just wouldn’t want to spend that much money. I don’t think I’d have a problem accepting an heirloom ring/stone from his family, but I’d probably have an issue if his mother was the one actually buying the ring (as in if your Fiance doesn’t pay them back) like some other PPs said.
Post # 95
They’re not making him pay the full 10K back – only the original 5K, which is good, because that’s way more than he had wanted (or I would ever want) to spend, but also not good, because now it’s not really a loan..it’s like a half loan.
Post # 96
Well it really depends on how you feel about it, our opinions don’t really matter because you’re the one that has to wear the ring everyday. You have to ask yourself if you’ll be ok with the fact that the ring is half from your Fiance and half from your Future Mother-In-Law. For me, it’d seem a bit invasive since the ring is supposed to be a symbol of love and commitment from your Fiance. I know I definitely don’t want to think of my Mother-In-Law when I’m thinking about loving my husband. However, as long as you’re okay with it, it shouldn’t matter. Obviously it’s bothering you at least a little if you’re making a post about it.
Post # 97
Don’t care. In fact, I specifically stated you could call me judgmental. You guys had taken up most of a page when I saw it.
And I wasn’t criticizing your opinion of the actual topic. It was just ridiculously annoying to see you guys going back and forth.