(Closed) Unique reception table layout – will save $!

posted 7 years ago in Reception
Post # 3
Member
9056 posts
Buzzing Beekeeper
  • Wedding: June 2010

I think it’s  pretty cool, but keep in mind, you’d be able to fit three less people at each table, so what you save in centrepieces, you might lose in extra tables/linens depending on what you want?

I also think that draping is there to cover whatever additional bit they’ve added to the tables so the centrepiece actually has a place to balance on, but if you can think of something cute that doesn’t need a cover, it’s great!

Post # 4
Member
798 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: June 2011

That’s a great idea!

Post # 5
Member
5984 posts
Bee Keeper
  • Wedding: January 1999

@SapphireSun:  Good point! 

@amw511s:  Very unique design!  Typically, you’d have about 8-10 people per table…so, this would mean that you’d need 10 “sets” of tables for 150 guests (30 tables vs. 15 tables).  If the white tablecloths are free of charge at your venue, you’ll only need to dish out extra money for runners (30 of them vs. 15).  You’ll just have to look for great deals on runners, so you come out ahead!  Just trying to figure out if you’ll save $. 

Post # 6
Member
1145 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: December 2011

@amw511s: Wouldnt it make it harder to talk at the tables. I dont know if you would save money with this idea…

Post # 7
Member
160 posts
Blushing bee
  • Wedding: June 2011

Super cool!

Post # 8
Member
4419 posts
Honey bee
  • Wedding: December 2010

This looks really cool, but I can see some major issues that you should consider. 

This arrangement is going to take more floor space, because you’ll need three tables for seating 15 people, when you would normally need only two tables for 16 people.  That means you probably won’t be able to get as many people in your venue.  

As someone else stated, it’s going to make it hard for your guests to converse with each other. I think people also find it uncomfortable when they feel like they have their backs to people who are at the same table, which is going to be the situation for the six people who are seated adjacent to the where the tables intersect. 

You’ll have to pay for additional table cloths, and you will need something to bridge the gap between the three tables to support the flower arrangements. Also, you’ll need to make sure the tables are secured to each other somehow, otherwise if they get bumped or shifted a bit, the center piece might slip off the tables. 

Post # 9
Member
5110 posts
Bee Keeper
  • Wedding: November 2011

I think it looks coo, but I dont know how its going to work. It coud go either way goodor bad. If you do this let us know how it goes. I think it looks really interesting. 

Post # 10
Member
1 posts
Wannabee

 

 

@amw511s:  I’d love to know if you decided to go with this layout and how it goes!  I’ve been thinking about this too, but it’s pretty uncommon and hard to find pictures and ideas for it!

Post # 12
Member
1471 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: April 2012

you will have to have more tables, chairs cloths ect…. Will it really save you that much money?  You dont have to have crazy centerpieces on tables, we just had flowers in a simple square elegant vase and lots of candles on our tables!  

Post # 13
Member
3 posts
Wannabee
  • Wedding: September 2012

THAT LOOKS COOL

Post # 14
Member
88 posts
Worker bee
  • Wedding: July 2013

My friend just got married in May and did the SAME thing with her tables. She DEF!!! saved $$ on centerpieces, thats for sure. She had a “WOW FACTOR” Middle centerpiece and three smaller ones on the three tables to accompany the large one. The only downfall that I noticed was that you couldn’t really make conversation with the people sitting accross the table because they were just too far away. But it def. looks awesome once all set up!!

The topic ‘Unique reception table layout – will save $!’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors