- 11 months ago
i would really appreciate your help in assisting me to choose my wedding dress. It boiled down to these THREE. They are very different but equally stunning and I really don’t know how to choose.
The wedding with be in a small non-denominational church like setting and reception at farm like setting in june. I want to feel/look like a bride and I want the Wow factor but I honestly can’t decide on one. They are priced comparabily. Please can you help!!!!!!!!!!
2nd dress with sleeves alterations would raise them to higher spot on arm. They hung too low cause dress was so big and bring up the V in front so girls arent as exposed
I really like the second one, except I don’t like the sleeves hanging off the shoulders. Looks a bit odd IMO.
Loooove everything else about it. The blingy details trailing from the bodice into the skirt are just beautiful. And does the skirt have blush undertone? Love that too.
I love the third!
The lace detail on #1 is gorgeous but I also love the fit of #3 on you. You can’t go wrong in any of the 3 though!
The third one is definitely the most flattering on you IMO!
Absolutely love #1! It was my runner up dress. It’s beautiful 😍
1 or 3. I’m not a fan of 2.
The third flatters you the best. I would definitely pick that one! First would be my second pick. I don’t like the sleeves on the second one but it’s nice otherwise.
Definitely the third, it’s classy and sexy all at once, though personally I’d add a liner to the top – the skirt/bodice connection is really abrupt. I despise the second option – mostly because I hate that boob slit trend (and the ‘sleeves’), and the first I feel like the lace is too heavy looking, for lack of a better description.
#3 for sure.
i def want something sexy to fit my figure but still classy and timeless.
I can’t believe the 2nd doesn’t have more votes! It’s so dreamy 😍 I do agree with the others that the sleeves hang too low though, if they were shortened it’d be perfect!
I like the 1st one. It makes your figure look amazing and that train is amazing.