(Closed) Wedding Bands – Why so fancy?

posted 11 years ago in Rings
Post # 17
3928 posts
Honey bee
  • Wedding: March 2011

I also don’t think it is a regional thing. I think it is a matter of preference. I am not worried aobut losing stones, damaging my ring, or losing it, so I chose to get stones in my band. I love it because is compliments my ering very nicely. It is not about greed or keeping up with the Jonses; it is about what you like, are comfortable with, and can afford. You will be wearing it for the rest of your life, and if you are the type of person that knows you will not want to upgrade later, then it makes sense to get the one you want now.

Post # 18
178 posts
Blushing bee
  • Wedding: October 2010

My Fiance and I got bands that are white gold with eachother’s fingerprint on the inside. On mine however I got 5 little stones, three sapphires and two diamonds. They are quite tiny and are only there because they remind me of when we got started dating. It also matches my engagement ring. But other than the 5 tiny stones it is just a narrow white gold band to match my FI’s. I do not plan on taking my band off. Maybe it is a regional thing. To each their own 🙂

Post # 19
8375 posts
Bumble Beekeeper
  • Wedding: June 2009

Um, because I like fancy jewelry? So, it’d be weird if i had a plain band Tongue out

Post # 20
47 posts
  • Wedding: October 2012

Personally, the ring I have now is just gold, no stones but it is a very ornate style. It fits my personality, plus, I really like the idea of having something that you don’t see often.  I like to stand out a bit and have my own style.  Here’s a pic of my ring, and I don’t see that many people with a style like this. So it kinda is uniquely me.


Post # 21
623 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: April 2010

In hindsight I wish I’d gotten a metal band, either plain flat metal or MAAAAYBE some sort of simple pattern/braid.  I love my shared-prong eternity band, but now that I’ve been wearing it a month, the prongs catch on things (especially my hair!), I have to try to remember to take it off (then put it back on!!) to put lotions etc on since it gtes dirty REALLY fast, and with the diamonds, it’s thicker and sticks out further from my finger which can be uncomfortable.

I do think I was swayed by the wedding machine into getting a diamond band since it’s not really “me” to begin with.  I wear no other jewelry, and there’s nothing glitzy or flashy about me.  That all said, i DO still think it’s VEEERY pretty (just not functional for me)

Post # 22
958 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: September 2010

There are a lot of wedding-realted things that I only learned about and decided I wanted after being exposed to blogs and message boards.  Rings are no different.

I don’t think it’s regional so much as cultural and personal.  I think most people plan on wearing this ring for a long, long time, so they want one that coordinates with their style and taste.  Or (like me) they wanted it to match their e-ring.  I may have chosen something different if it wasn’t a set, but I do love how they go together.

Post # 23
1958 posts
Buzzing bee
  • Wedding: December 2009

Actually, out of all the people I know, I’m definitely in the minority when it comes to a plain wedding band, so as far as I knew, having a fancy wedding band is pretty much the norm.  And I don’t think it’s a matter of the wedding industry telling us what we need, rather a choice of personal wants and budget.

Post # 26
587 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: August 2009

I agree that plain bands don’t seem to be as common anymore (but e-rings seem fancier, too, maybe?). I think only one of my friends wears a plain band…

But that said, I got a plain gold band, mainly because of its practicality. I wanted to be able to where it all the time, even in situations where I’m afraid to wear my e-ring (like when i’m working with kids and finger paint. Ha!). Plus my e-ring is a claddaugh and I thought a fancy band would be a bit much for me.

But I agree with other posters: go with what you like and what fits your personality/lifestyle best 🙂

Post # 27
2297 posts
Buzzing bee
  • Wedding: October 2009

Apparently, the stones in engagement rings have gotten larger, and stones in wedding bands have become more common, over time.  Personally, I would never criticize anyone who wanted diamonds, but I am frustrated by the fact that so many seem to see a diamond as a requirement for an engagement or marriage.  Come on, folks–it’s a piece of jewelry, not a guarantee of a happy relationship!

NotFroofy and I decided early on that we did not want engagement rings, or wedding rings with stones.  We both have plain gold bands as our wedding rings.

Post # 28
983 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: June 2010

I wear my wedding band alone, so I wanted some diamonds.

Here is a stock photo of mine. It sparkles, and it’s just flashy enough.  I love it:


Post # 29
425 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: July 2010

I always thought that I would have a plain white gold band.  However, the ering my man picked has a lot of diamonds so I ended up picking a band that also has some sparkle as well.  When I tried a plain band with my ering it looked a little weird.  

Post # 30
190 posts
Blushing bee
  • Wedding: August 2010

I always thought I wanted an all yellow gold band with nothing else, but then after trying them on, I realized I wanted a little more “sparkle” and ended up getting a channel set ring with some small diamonds on the front. In the future, for whatever reason, if I want to move my e-ring to my other hand, I like how the wedding band will look on its own still.

The topic ‘Wedding Bands – Why so fancy?’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors