(Closed) Wedding dress! What do you think?

posted 6 years ago in Dress
Post # 2
201 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: December 2015

I think it looks great!

Post # 3
1186 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: August 2015

it looks sooo much bettter now! beautiful!

Post # 4
821 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: October 2016

It looks good on you. Personally, I think it looks a little nightgown-ish.

Post # 5
2456 posts
Buzzing bee
  • Wedding: November 2015 - City, State

The slit and material of the skirt makes it look like a nightgown 😬 but it still looks way better than it did before! You have a great figure though.

Post # 6
1695 posts
Bumble bee

It gets skimpier and skimpier! Way better than the first. Do you love it? It’s very far from the dress style it looks like you wanted — long sleeve, long skirt.

Post # 7
654 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: August 2015 - Southern Plantation House

It does look better Bee, but I’m not loving it. The material of the skirt looks a little thin and unfinished for me. If it was a heavier satin or more structured I think it would make a big difference. Maybe if it the skirt even had some tulle to finish it, and the existing material be a lining?

You do look FAB in it though! I love your vision, but I’m not quite sure if it is complete yet.

Post # 8
3527 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: January 2017

You look good in it, but the dress itself I dont like sorry.

Post # 9
98 posts
Worker bee
  • Wedding: MGM Grand Skyline Terrace

I think you look great in it and it is so unique which I love! You won’t look like every Allue/Maggie/DB bride out there. 

Post # 10
2285 posts
Buzzing bee
  • Wedding: September 2013

It looks a whole lot better but I’m still not really a fan. Firstly it still look unfinished, with the hem and the seam at the back.

Secondly, I don’t know – it looks more like a dress a bride would switch into later in the night so she can dance, with the slit and everything. Doesn’t mean it can’t be worn as a wedding dress. But that is the impression it gives me.

Post # 11
4077 posts
Honey bee
  • Wedding: June 2010

You wear it well, but it looks like a fancy nightgown 🙁 

Post # 12
5641 posts
Bee Keeper
  • Wedding: November 2009 - New York, NY

You have a fantastic figure and anything would look good on you, including this dress.  The dress itself though, I don’t like.

Post # 13
7937 posts
Bumble Beekeeper
  • Wedding: February 1997

It is kind of surprising that you turned the dress into something it seems you originally didn’t want (low-cut and strapless). I’m not a big fan of the thin satin, the puckering down the back seam and the negligee look, but I do agree that you have the figure to carry off almost anything. I just think you could do a lot better.

Post # 14
112 posts
Blushing bee

You have a great figure. Honestly I like the phase 1 version best. It looks like the top of the dress needs more structure – the 3 pic is way better than the 2nd, but even in teh third it looks like it is not supporting you enough. However, I am very modest in my clothing and would not be comfortable with so much upper body skin exposed. I like strapless better when they are hiked up a bit more….

Post # 15
8515 posts
Bumble Beekeeper

Agree with PPs. You have an incredible body, but I probably would have just spent that $1k on a new dress rather than try to salvage this one. I don’t mind the top so much (although the U shape in the neckline seems quite wide and makes your girls seem miles apart), it’s the skirt that I’m really not digging. It looks cheap and like a liner. I like PP’s idea of putting tulle over it (so it’s actually a liner), but I don’t know if more manipulation would do more harm than good at this point. 

Does it photograph differently than it looks IRL? Maybe if it comes off more polished/refined in person. 

The topic ‘Wedding dress! What do you think?’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors