(Closed) Wedding dress! What do you think?

posted 6 years ago in Dress
Post # 2
Member
201 posts
Helper bee
  • Wedding: December 2015

I think it looks great!

Post # 3
Member
1186 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: August 2015

it looks sooo much bettter now! beautiful!

Post # 4
Member
821 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: October 2016

It looks good on you. Personally, I think it looks a little nightgown-ish.

Post # 5
Member
2456 posts
Buzzing bee
  • Wedding: November 2015 - City, State

The slit and material of the skirt makes it look like a nightgown 😬 but it still looks way better than it did before! You have a great figure though.

Post # 6
Member
1695 posts
Bumble bee

It gets skimpier and skimpier! Way better than the first. Do you love it? It’s very far from the dress style it looks like you wanted — long sleeve, long skirt.

Post # 7
Member
654 posts
Busy bee
  • Wedding: August 2015 - Southern Plantation House

It does look better Bee, but I’m not loving it. The material of the skirt looks a little thin and unfinished for me. If it was a heavier satin or more structured I think it would make a big difference. Maybe if it the skirt even had some tulle to finish it, and the existing material be a lining?

You do look FAB in it though! I love your vision, but I’m not quite sure if it is complete yet.

Post # 8
Member
3527 posts
Sugar bee
  • Wedding: January 2017

You look good in it, but the dress itself I dont like sorry.

Post # 9
Member
98 posts
Worker bee
  • Wedding: MGM Grand Skyline Terrace

I think you look great in it and it is so unique which I love! You won’t look like every Allue/Maggie/DB bride out there. 

Post # 10
Member
2285 posts
Buzzing bee
  • Wedding: September 2013

It looks a whole lot better but I’m still not really a fan. Firstly it still look unfinished, with the hem and the seam at the back.

Secondly, I don’t know – it looks more like a dress a bride would switch into later in the night so she can dance, with the slit and everything. Doesn’t mean it can’t be worn as a wedding dress. But that is the impression it gives me.

Post # 11
Member
4077 posts
Honey bee
  • Wedding: June 2010

You wear it well, but it looks like a fancy nightgown 🙁 

Post # 12
Member
5641 posts
Bee Keeper
  • Wedding: November 2009 - New York, NY

You have a fantastic figure and anything would look good on you, including this dress.  The dress itself though, I don’t like.

Post # 13
Member
7937 posts
Bumble Beekeeper
  • Wedding: February 1997

It is kind of surprising that you turned the dress into something it seems you originally didn’t want (low-cut and strapless). I’m not a big fan of the thin satin, the puckering down the back seam and the negligee look, but I do agree that you have the figure to carry off almost anything. I just think you could do a lot better.

Post # 14
Member
112 posts
Blushing bee

You have a great figure. Honestly I like the phase 1 version best. It looks like the top of the dress needs more structure – the 3 pic is way better than the 2nd, but even in teh third it looks like it is not supporting you enough. However, I am very modest in my clothing and would not be comfortable with so much upper body skin exposed. I like strapless better when they are hiked up a bit more….

Post # 15
Member
8515 posts
Bumble Beekeeper

Agree with PPs. You have an incredible body, but I probably would have just spent that $1k on a new dress rather than try to salvage this one. I don’t mind the top so much (although the U shape in the neckline seems quite wide and makes your girls seem miles apart), it’s the skirt that I’m really not digging. It looks cheap and like a liner. I like PP’s idea of putting tulle over it (so it’s actually a liner), but I don’t know if more manipulation would do more harm than good at this point. 

Does it photograph differently than it looks IRL? Maybe if it comes off more polished/refined in person. 

The topic ‘Wedding dress! What do you think?’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors