(Closed) What counts as a "short" engagement?

posted 5 years ago in Logistics
  • poll: What do you consider a "short" engagement?
    Less than 3 months : (4 votes)
    7 %
    Less than 6 months : (31 votes)
    53 %
    Less than 9 months : (15 votes)
    26 %
    Less than 12 months : (7 votes)
    12 %
    Less than 18 months : (1 votes)
    2 %
    Less than 24 months : (0 votes)
  • Post # 3
    Member
    4035 posts
    Honey bee

    @mrsjkm:  I said less than 6 months just because at that point it can be difficut (though not impossible) to book the venue, photographer, baker and buy the dress/have it arrive, and give guests that are travelling ample notice. Some places book 8-15 months in advance, dresses can take months to arrive and photographers book early too.

    To me a short engagement would be one that might make the process a little difficult because you put more pressure on finding things in time.

    FWIW, we are having a 10 month engagement and I almost feel likes it is a little too long for us. An 8 month engagement would have been better, but I really want an August wedding. 🙂

    Post # 4
    Member
    2335 posts
    Buzzing bee
    • Wedding: April 2018

    I come from a background where 6 months seems like a ‘normal’ engagement to me. Something shorter than 6 months I guess I’d consider ‘short.’

    Anything longer than 9 months I’d consider kind of ‘long.’ My own engagement was 11 months (unforunately there wasn’t a sooner date that would work for us) and it felt like an ETERNITY. Only 34 days left to go now, though!

    Post # 5
    Member
    2106 posts
    Buzzing bee
    • Wedding: September 2012

    Short is 3 months or less- get married in the same season of the engagement and that’s a short engagement. 

    Post # 6
    Member
    8472 posts
    Bumble Beekeeper
    • Wedding: July 2012

    I voted 1 year or less. Around here, a year & a half is about average. (Or somewhere around 14 months)

    Post # 7
    Member
    53 posts
    Worker bee
    • Wedding: May 2013

    I got engaged in December last year and I’m getting married in May…so thats about 6 months. I think that’s sorta average. Anything less than that might be short. But I have had people tell me that they think I’m getting married too soon. But I don’t think so. Its not like I have to wait for anything. 

    Post # 8
    Member
    4049 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: January 2014

    I voted 9 months or less. I think the better part of a year or more is pretty standard.

    Post # 9
    Member
    12249 posts
    Sugar Beekeeper
    • Wedding: May 2013

    We planned in 5.5months, and it was VERY high pressure for the first 2 months we were planning (until the officiant, reception, and photographer were booked and my dress was purchased). After that it was fine!

    The topic ‘What counts as a "short" engagement?’ is closed to new replies.

    Find Amazing Vendors