(Closed) What do y'all think of this ring?

posted 3 years ago in Rings
  • poll: What do you think?
    Beautiful. : (31 votes)
    52 %
    Eh, okay. : (22 votes)
    37 %
    Th ring sucks. You suck. No diamonds for you! : (7 votes)
    12 %
  • Post # 2
    Member
    3723 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: August 2013

    I would check with a jeweler and make sure that setting can be resized by that much. I would bet not with that pave. 

    Post # 3
    Member
    706 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: October 2014

    Is it from e-bay?

    One bee posted a link to e-bay shop with extremely cheap rings.. Just hope you are not going to buy something there!

    Post # 4
    Member
    103 posts
    Blushing bee

    I love that!! 

    Post # 5
    Member
    769 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: September 2014

    Because the pave only goes around a little I think it should be ok to size if you go to a master jeweler. They will add gold to make it bigger then tighten all the stones at the top of the band.  

     

    I love it!

    Post # 6
    Member
    9494 posts
    Buzzing Beekeeper
    • Wedding: September 2015

    Might be the pic but it looks like the cut might not be so good and it’s visibly included. what are the stats? Is it certified?

    Post # 7
    Member
    408 posts
    Helper bee
    • Wedding: October 2015 - Hanover Grande Ballroom

    it does look visibly included.

    Post # 8
    Member
    557 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: September 2017

    I like the setting but something is off with the stone. It doesn’t look good (could be the pics). Being a size 9 also, I’d have the ring replicated in my size instead of getting it stretched. Wouldn’t want to risk losing side stones

    Post # 9
    Member
    591 posts
    Busy bee
    • Wedding: July 2014

    If you want an honest opinion, the diamond quality looks absolutely horrible in both cut and clarity.  If neither of those qualities are important to you then I would go ahead and check with a jeweler on resizing before you purchase. 

    Post # 10
    Member
    1737 posts
    Bumble bee

    The stone doesn’t look good. Post the stats

    Post # 11
    Member
    1460 posts
    Bumble bee
    • Wedding: January 2015

    I can really clearly see the inclusions in the stone, which means its an I2-3 clarity. I know having a big stone is nice, but you really shouldn’t pay any more than about $1500 for that ring with clarity like that.

    Post # 12
    Member
    7826 posts
    Bumble Beekeeper

    There are many rings that look similar to this one. It’s not necessarily what I would pick, but what matters is that you like it and you love the person who got it for you.

    The topic ‘What do y'all think of this ring?’ is closed to new replies.

    Get our weekly roundup of the best of Weddingbee.
    I agree to receive emails from the site. I can withdraw my consent at any time by unsubscribing.

    Find Amazing Vendors