(Closed) What do you think of this ring?

posted 6 years ago in Rings
  • poll: Which would you pick. It wouldnt be my every day ring it will be one to play with.
    The expensive 3.8mm one "I never go cheap" : (17 votes)
    12 %
    They are identical so go with the 3mm inexpensive one : (81 votes)
    59 %
    I like puppy breath : (16 votes)
    12 %
    I like polls : (23 votes)
    17 %

    105 votes

    • Post # 1
    Member
    4714 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: January 1998

    One is $900 ish the other is $89 bucks can you tell the diff???? one is 3.8mm one is 3mm wide…which would you choose?

    Post # 3
    Member
    5428 posts
    Bee Keeper

    I like it. 

    Post # 4
    Member
    3668 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: July 2015

    If they were the same price, I would choose the narrower one because I personally prefer narrow over wide bands. Although since the pics are different sizes, I can’t really tell which one is wider!

    Post # 5
    Member
    4714 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: January 1998

    I added a poll and the measurements for both 🙂

    Post # 6
    Member
    3220 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: February 2012

    I think I’d be able to tell the difference in person– I’d also consider the types of metals and stones used in the bands.  I’m going to guess the 2nd one is the more expensive ring– it looks sturdier and more well-made, even if I’m not a huge fan of the style!

    the 2nd one reminds me of something I’d see at Tiffanys… or it could just be a Tiffany’s knock-off!

    either way, I personally would never pick a sterling silver “forever” ring, so if I liked this style, then I’d pick the better quality materials.

    Post # 7
    Member
    11391 posts
    Sugar Beekeeper
    • Wedding: December 2010

    If this is a play ring to add to your set I would go for the cheaper one! That way you can have LOTS of different play rings to switch out with. 🙂

    Post # 8
    Member
    2869 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: August 2013

    Girl, you’re gonna lose your mind with all these play rings.  hahaha.  I like the first one a bit better; it looks more expensive but I actually don’t know which one is which.  I’d go for the thinner one. 

    Post # 9
    Member
    4714 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: January 1998

    @bookworm88:  this wouldnt be a forever ring…just something to play with.

    Post # 11
    Member
    4714 posts
    Honey bee
    • Wedding: January 1998

    @loving_life:  I think the first one looks more expensive too. I cant get enough of rings and this geometric look is pretty cool

    Post # 12
    Member
    3220 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: February 2012

    @GelaMac:  oh, sorry I can’t help you then– I wear the same jewelry everyday, never been a “play ring” person! 

    Post # 13
    Member
    2869 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: August 2013

    @GelaMac:  which one is actually which?

    Post # 14
    Member
    272 posts
    Helper bee
    • Wedding: September 2013

    Honestly, all I can tell is that one ring has better photography behind it, so I’m guessing that’s the more expensive ring. Otherwise, the style is exactly the same!

    Post # 16
    Member
    2869 posts
    Sugar bee
    • Wedding: August 2013

    Then yes, I definitely stand by my statement that I prefer the first one 😀

    ETA: Exceptttttt that the first one is SS and the second one is WG so depending on how often you wear it I’d be worried about the SS wearing against your e-ring?

    The topic ‘What do you think of this ring?’ is closed to new replies.

    Find Amazing Vendors