Post # 1
Member
129 posts
Blushing bee
Hey everyone, so I posted earlier…but had all of the carat sizes messed up (so results were totally inaccurate lol…sorry about that)
As mentioned in my previous post…I have a size 9 finger, but smaller hands because I am short….so I am trying to find the carat size that is nice for my hand…
In the picture…the top left is 1 ct.
the bottom right is 1.25
do I go for a 1.5 ct. OR 2 ct (neither of these sizes are in the picture)
THANKS EVERYONE 🙂
Post # 3
Member
3683 posts
Sugar bee
I voted for 1.25, but both will be lovely.
Post # 4
Member
2811 posts
Sugar bee
I would go with the 1.25 carat diamond. It gives really good coverage to your finger.
Post # 5
Member
378 posts
Helper bee
I think the 1.5 looks good on your ring size. I wouldn’t go any bigger than that but I have little fingers (4.25) so I don’t really look at rings above 1 carat. That 1.5 looks huge.
Post # 6
Member
378 posts
Helper bee
well Sh*T I meant 1.25 not 1.5
Post # 7
Member
913 posts
Busy bee
Dude, they are both huge, whichever! lol
Post # 8
Member
931 posts
Busy bee
I replied earlier but I’ll reply again, I say closer to 2ct. I have a 1.75ct round stone and my ring size is 4.5. I love the way the bigger stone looks on my smaller finger. I will say that if you do go bigger, make sure its a quality stone. Dont just go bigger bc it looks better on your finger. The larger the stone, the more flaws & poor quality are noticeable. There is a HUGE price difference between the 1.25 and 2ct so if the 2ct is in your price range, go for it.
Post # 9
Member
9168 posts
Buzzing Beekeeper
Hey if you can afford 2 go for it! 🙂
Post # 10
Member
3828 posts
Honey bee
If you can afford big then go big or go home lol