Post # 1
Post # 2
btw the pronovias dress photo with a belt on it is not me, but it gives you an idea of what it looks like with a belt on it :)..
Post # 3
I am a Tara Keely 2400 bride so of course I say go with my dress lol! The skirt is amazing when it is all fluffed out and I feel like the lace is so romantic, sexy- yet elegant! The reason I chose the dress was that I felt it was edgy and different, yet it will satisy my older family members and I know I will look back and always love it. It definately has a wow factor! Good luck!
Post # 4
The Tara Keely is AMAZING!
Post # 5
- Wedding: August 2014 - Stan Mansion
The first one is amazing then the last one. Not a fan of the middle one.
Post # 7
- Wedding: August 2016 - Belmont Manor
I am obsessed with the Tara Keely but I also love the first. Personally, I would choose the first one!
Post # 9
- Wedding: December 2014 - The Villa
I love the Pronovias… like love. I think it’s all the bling you need, obviously not in the traditional sense but that’s what gives it the uniqueness you were looking for. You have a great figure so I personally don’t think you need the belt, the design on the beading of the dress lends itself to showing off your tiny waist. However, the belt isn’t a no-go… it’s just ‘unnecessary’.
Post # 10
Not a fan of the Tara Keely – it looks like two dresses frankensteined together. I love the Allure though.
Post # 11
BeeYoutiful: I prefer the Tara Keely, but that’s more a reflection of my personal tastes rather than anything. You suit all of them so it really just depends on what you’re going for.
How about the Maggie Sottero Sahara or Velma – both seem like a combination of all three (and are also available in white)
Post # 12
The middle one is so perfect for you. Actually looks like it was made for you. Beaut <3