(Closed) Which ring do you prefer?

• shuane
• 4 years ago

• Wedding: October 2016

The Tiffany style ring is simply Gorgeous. 

• RayKay
• 4 years ago

• Wedding: January 2010

The Tiffany style for sure! I am not a big fan of pave though – one of those people who likes more metal over more stones 🙂

• CarolineNY
• 4 years ago

• Wedding: June 2016

The tiffanys style but with a smaller stone, it is a little too large to go with the eternity ring – they need to be balanced.

• liaeona
• 4 years ago

I would like the pave better if the center stone was smaller. It looks too big for the finger and overshadows the band when it’s that big.

• MrsGirlyGirl
• 4 years ago

• Wedding: November 2015 - City, State

Pave. Love extra bling! 🙂

• BalletParker
• 4 years ago

• Wedding: June 2015

The Tiffany. It’s classic and forever beautiful. 

• thepinkflamingo
• 4 years ago

I love the pave – it’s a beautiful basket as well with the detailing.

• stillme
• 4 years ago

• Wedding: September 2010

I like them both but don’t think

either looks good with the eternity band. 

• skunktastic
• 4 years ago

• Wedding: June 2015

I prefer the Tiffany and the smaller stone as well – the big one just looks weird next to that band.

• MrsBuesleBee
• 4 years ago

• Wedding: September 2015

The classic but I’m biased- I have and love that ring. I would consider a different cut if youre going as big as some of those! I think RBs can start to get door-knobby at a certain point. I think elongated cuts looks better past 3 carats or so.

• RayKay
• 4 years ago

• Wedding: January 2010

MrsBuesleBee:  Yes, for me too. They remind me of the crystal doorknobs I had growing up and in my own first house. I like cushions (or elongated stepcuts) at that 3+ carat size though!

• hyacinthblue
• 4 years ago

Tiffany style every time.

• ad85
• 4 years ago

I voted for the solitaire. Tiny pave looks “messy” to me. I’m sure there’s a better word to describe it but I’m tired.