(Closed) Which time frame makes more sense?

posted 5 years ago in Reception
Post # 3
12247 posts
Sugar Beekeeper
  • Wedding: May 2013

You added an extra hour to dinner… Are you having a lot of toasts or something?

I think the time frame looks good!

Post # 4
1088 posts
Bumble bee
  • Wedding: July 2014

I like the second one, more time to dance!!

Post # 5
491 posts
Helper bee

I’m voting for the second one, mainly because that’s almost exactly our timeline. We decided on the earlier ceremony to have the extra reception time to party. 

Post # 7
193 posts
Blushing bee
  • Wedding: November 2014

I just went to a wedding where dinner didn’t end until 9. It was definitely not enough time to dance and everything felt way too rushed. Definitely go with the earlier ceremony/dinner.

The topic ‘Which time frame makes more sense?’ is closed to new replies.

Find Amazing Vendors